The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments
Open accessAbstract
In the information age, the ability to read and construct data visualizations becomes as important as the ability to read and write text. However, while standard definitions and theoretical frameworks to teach and assess textual, mathematical, and visual literacy exist, current data visualization literacy (DVL) definitions and frameworks are not comprehensive enough to guide the design of DVL teaching and assessment. This paper introduces a data visualization literacy framework (DVL-FW) that was specifically developed to define, teach, and assess DVL. The holistic DVL-FW promotes both the reading and construction of data visualizations, a pairing analogous to that of both reading and writing in textual literacy and understanding and applying in mathematical literacy. Specifically, the DVL-FW defines a hierarchical typology of core concepts and details the process steps that are required to extract insights from data. Advancing the state of the art, the DVL-FW interlinks theoretical and procedural knowledge and showcases how both can be combined to design curricula and assessment measures for DVL. Earlier versions of the DVL-FW have been used to teach DVL to more than 8,500 residential and online students, and results from this effort have helped revise and validate the DVL-FW presented here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Cited by 6,708
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761 · cited 1×
“Building on the work of Stevens (39), the DVL-FW distinguishes nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio data based on the type of logical mathematical operations that are permissible (Fig.”
BackgroundThe eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations
Shneiderman, B. (2002) · Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages · doi:10.1109/vl.1996.545307 · Cited by 4,535
Bransford, J. D. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,530
Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080 · Cited by 1,788
Visualization Analysis and Design
Munzner, T. (2014) · A K Peters/CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b17511 · Cited by 1,697
Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information
Mackinlay, J. (1986) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/22949.22950 · Cited by 1,610
Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps
Bertin, J., & Berg, W. J. (2010) · Cited by 1,555
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017327 · Cited by 1,168
How Maps WorkRepresentation, Visualization, and Design
MacEachren, A. M. (1995) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 1,095
Cited by
Accessible Visualization: Design Space, Opportunities, and Challenges
Kim, N. W., Joyner, S. C., Riegelhuth, A., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.14298 · Cited by 137
You’d Better Stop! Understanding Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models under Covariate Shift
Chiang, C.-W., & Yin, M. (2021) · 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021 · doi:10.1145/3447535.3462487 · Cited by 53
Chiang, C.-W., & Yin, M. (2022) · 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511121 · Cited by 42
A Systematic Review on Visualizations for Self-Generated Health Data for Daily Activities
Kim, S.-H. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191811166 · Cited by 22
Understanding and Automating Graphical Annotations on Animated Scatterplots
Shi, D., Oulasvirta, A., Weinkauf, T., & Cao, N. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 17th Pacific Visualization Conference (PacificVis) · doi:10.1109/pacificvis60374.2024.00031 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Börner, K., Bueckle, A., & Ginda, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2019-02-04
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1857-1864
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2913589238
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1807180116
- The paper
- Börner, K., Bueckle, A., & Ginda, M. (2019). Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807180116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.