The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods
Abstract
The subject of graphical methods for data analysis and for data presentation needs a scientific foundation. In this article we take a few steps in the direction of establishing such a foundation. Our approach is based on graphical perception—the visual decoding of information encoded on graphs—and it includes both theory and experimentation to test the theory. The theory deals with a small but important piece of the whole process of graphical perception. The first part is an identification of a set of elementary perceptual tasks that are carried out when people extract quantitative information from graphs. The second part is an ordering of the tasks on the basis of how accurately people perform them. Elements of the theory are tested by experimentation in which subjects record their judgments of the quantitative information on graphs. The experiments validate these elements but also suggest that the set of elementary tasks should be expanded. The theory provides a guideline for graph construction: Graphs should employ elementary tasks as high in the ordering as possible. This principle is applied to a variety of graphs, including bar charts, divided bar charts, pie charts, and statistical maps with shading. The conclusion is that radical surgery on these popular graphs is needed, and as replacements we offer alternative graphical forms—dot charts, dot charts with grouping, and framed-rectangle charts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
The Relative Merits of Circles and Bars for Representing Component Parts
Eells, W. C. (1926) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1926.10502165 · Cited by 108 · cited 2×
“This was a controversy (Eells 1926; Croxton 1927; Crox-ton and Stryker 1927; von Huhn 1927) about whether the divided bar chart or the pie chart was superior for por-traying the parts of a whole.”
BackgroundBar Charts versus Circle Diagrams
Croxton, F. E., & Stryker, R. E. (1927) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502976 · Cited by 81 · cited 1×
“More than 50 years ago a battle raged on the pages of the Journal of the American Statistical Association about the relative merits of bar charts and pie charts (Eells 1926; Croxton 1927; Croxton and Stryker 1927; von Huhn 1927).”
Background
Cited by
UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties
Conway, J. R., Lex, A., & Gehlenborg, N. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364 · Cited by 3,586
Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*
Vessey, I. (1991) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x · Cited by 1,263
Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(2021) · doi:10.1145/3411764 · Cited by 1,240
Vega-Lite: A Grammar of Interactive Graphics
Satyanarayan, A., Moritz, D., Wongsuphasawat, K., & Heer, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2016.2599030 · Cited by 883
Making Sense of Graphs: Critical Factors Influencing Comprehension and Instructional Implications
Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/749671 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 387
- Pages
- 531-554
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1971781829
- Cited by
- 1,788
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080
- The paper
- Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.