Cited by 7Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthSports Performance and Training

Reply to Gronwald et al. Exercise intensity does indeed matter; maximal oxygen uptake is the gold-standard indicator.

Open access
Suwabe, Kazuya, Byun, Kyeongho, Hyodo, Kazuki, Reagh, Zachariah M., Roberts, Jared M., Matsushita, Akira, Saotome, Kousaku, Ochi, Genta +5 more·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans the biological, physical, and social sciences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1818247115

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most research on interindividual heterogeneity in response to acute and regular physical exercising has focused on non-modifiable factors such as sex and different genotypes, while relatively little attention has been paid to exercise prescription as a modifiable factor.

    “In an attempt to better understand this interindividual heterogeneity in response to acute and regular physical exercising, most research, so far, has focused on non-modifiable factors such as sex and different genotypes, while relatively little attention has been paid to exercise prescription as a modifiable factor.”
  • Not all scientific disciplines investigating exercise-cognition are taking the issue of optimal exercise prescription parameters into account sufficiently.

    “Notably, what parameters are optimal to prescribe the best exercise for an individual is extensively discussed in the literature (Katch et al., 1978; Weltman et al., 1989, 1990; Gass et al., 1991; Meyer et al., 1999; Hofmann and Tschakert, 2010; Scharhag-Rosenberger et al., 2010; Mann et al., 2013; Weatherwax et al., 2016), but not all scientific disciplines investigating exercise–cognition are ta”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suwabe, K., Byun, K., Hyodo, K., Reagh, Z. M., Roberts, J. M., Matsushita, A., Saotome, K., Ochi, G., Fukuie, T., Suzuki, K., Sankai, Y., Yassa, M. A., & Soya, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences (JP)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-12-12
Volume
115
Issue
51
Pages
E11892-E11893
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2903824113
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H04081, 16H06405)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
exercise intensity, VO2max, exercise training, cardiorespiratory fitness
MeSH terms
Gold, Humans, Oxygen, Oxygen Consumption, Exercise, Dentate Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review