Cited by 69melanin and skin pigmentationZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Fate plasticity and reprogramming in genetically distinct populations of Danio leucophores

Open access
Lewis, Victor M., Saunders, Lauren M., Larson, Tracy A., Bain, Emily J., Sturiale, Samantha L., Gur, Dvir, Chowdhury, Sarwat, Flynn, Jessica D. +7 more·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Understanding genetic and cellular bases of adult form remains a fundamental goal at the intersection of developmental and evolutionary biology. The skin pigment cells of vertebrates, derived from embryonic neural crest, are a useful system for elucidating mechanisms of fate specification, pattern formation, and how particular phenotypes impact organismal behavior and ecology. In a survey of Danio fishes, including the zebrafish Danio rerio , we identified two populations of white pigment cells—leucophores—one of which arises by transdifferentiation of adult melanophores and another of which develops from a yellow–orange xanthophore or xanthophore-like progenitor. Single-cell transcriptomic, mutational, chemical, and ultrastructural analyses of zebrafish leucophores revealed cell-type–specific chemical compositions, organelle configurations, and genetic requirements. At the organismal level, we identified distinct physiological responses of leucophores during environmental background matching, and we showed that leucophore complement influences behavior. Together, our studies reveal independently arisen pigment cell types and mechanisms of fate acquisition in zebrafish and illustrate how concerted analyses across hierarchical levels can provide insights into phenotypes and their evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1901021116

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [1]Price A. C., Weadick C. J., Shim J., Rodd F. H., Pigments, patterns, and fish behavior. Zebrafish 5, 297– 307 (2008). 19133828
  2. [2]Hubbard J. K., Uy J. A., Hauber M. E., Hoekstra H. E., Safran R. J., Vertebrate pigmentation: From underlying genes to adaptive function. Trends Genet. 26, 231– 239 (2010). 20381892
  3. [3]Marshall N. J., Cortesi F., de Busserolles F., Siebeck U. E., Cheney K. L., Colours and colour vision in reef fishes: Past, present and future research directions. J. Fish Biol. 10.1111/jfb.13849 (2018). 30357835 · DOI
  4. [4]Patterson L. B., Parichy D. M., Zebrafish pigment pattern formation: Insights into the development and evolution of adult form. Annu. Rev. Genet. 10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043741 (2019). 31509458 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Schartl M., What is a vertebrate pigment cell? Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 29, 8– 14 (2016). 26247887
  6. [6]Parichy D. M., Advancing biology through a deeper understanding of zebrafish ecology and evolution. eLife 4, e05635 (2015). PMC4373672 25807087
  7. [7]Patterson L. B., Bain E. J., Parichy D. M., Pigment cell interactions and differential xanthophore recruitment underlying zebrafish stripe reiteration and Danio pattern evolution. Nat. Commun. 5, 5299 (2014). 25374113 PMC4224114
  8. [8]Spiewak J. E., Evolution of Endothelin signaling and diversification of adult pigment pattern in Danio fishes. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007538 (2018). 30226839 PMC6161917
  9. [9]Kimura T., Leucophores are similar to xanthophores in their specification and differentiation processes in medaka. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 7343– 7348 (2014). 24803434 PMC4034200
  10. [10]Nagao Y., Sox5 functions as a fate switch in medaka pigment cell development. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004246 (2014). 24699463 PMC3974636
  11. [11]Hama T., “Chromatophores and iridocytes” in Medaka (Killifish) Biology and Strains, Yamamoto T., Ed. (Keigaku Publishing Co., Tokyo, 1975), pp. 138– 153.
  12. [12]Johnson S. L., Africa D., Walker C., Weston J. A., Genetic control of adult pigment stripe development in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 167, 27– 33 (1995). 7851648
  13. [13]McMenamin S. K., Thyroid hormone-dependent adult pigment cell lineage and pattern in zebrafish. Science 345, 1358– 1361 (2014). 25170046 PMC4211621
  14. [16]Tu S., Johnson S. L., Fate restriction in the growing and regenerating zebrafish fin. Dev. Cell 20, 725– 732 (2011). 21571228 PMC3096007
  15. [17]Curran K., Raible D. W., Lister J. A., Foxd3 controls melanophore specification in the zebrafish neural crest by regulation of Mitf. Dev. Biol. 332, 408– 417 (2009). 19527705 PMC2716409
  16. [18]Parichy D. M., Rawls J. F., Pratt S. J., Whitfield T. T., Johnson S. L., Zebrafish sparse corresponds to an orthologue of c-kit and is required for the morphogenesis of a subpopulation of melanocytes, but is not essential for hematopoiesis or primordial germ cell development. Development 126, 3425– 3436 (1999). 10393121
  17. [19]Parichy D. M., Ransom D. G., Paw B., Zon L. I., Johnson S. L., An orthologue of the kit-related gene fms is required for development of neural crest-derived xanthophores and a subpopulation of adult melanocytes in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 127, 3031– 3044 (2000). 10862741
  18. [20]Lopes S. S., Leukocyte tyrosine kinase functions in pigment cell development. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000026 (2008). 18369445 PMC2265441
  19. [21]Wehrle-Haller B., Weston J. A., Altered cell-surface targeting of stem cell factor causes loss of melanocyte precursors in Steel17H mutant mice. Dev. Biol. 210, 71– 86 (1999). 10364428
  20. [22]O’Reilly-Pol T., Johnson S. L., Kit signaling is involved in melanocyte stem cell fate decisions in zebrafish embryos. Development 140, 996– 1002 (2013). 23364331 PMC3583038
  21. [23]Rawls J. F., Johnson S. L., Temporal and molecular separation of the kit receptor tyrosine kinase’s roles in zebrafish melanocyte migration and survival. Dev. Biol. 262, 152– 161 (2003). 14512025
  22. [24]Lister J. A., Robertson C. P., Lepage T., Johnson S. L., Raible D. W., Nacre encodes a zebrafish microphthalmia-related protein that regulates neural-crest-derived pigment cell fate. Development 126, 3757– 3767 (1999). 10433906
  23. [25]Levy C., Khaled M., Fisher D. E., MITF: Master regulator of melanocyte development and melanoma oncogene. Trends Mol. Med. 12, 406– 414 (2006). 16899407
  24. [26]Johnson S. L., Nguyen A. N., Lister J. A., Mitfa is required at multiple stages of melanocyte differentiation but not to establish the melanocyte stem cell. Dev. Biol. 350, 405– 413 (2011). 21146516 PMC3040983
  25. [27]Zeng Z., Johnson S. L., Lister J. A., Patton E. E., Temperature-sensitive splicing of mitfa by an intron mutation in zebrafish. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 28, 229– 232 (2015). 25469769 PMC4333074
  26. [28]Gur D., The dual functional reflecting Iris of the Zebrafish. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 5, 1800338 (2018). 30128243 PMC6097150
  27. [29]Hirata M., Nakamura K., Kanemaru T., Shibata Y., Kondo S., Pigment cell organization in the hypodermis of zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 227, 497– 503 (2003). 12889058
  28. [30]Gur D., Palmer B. A., Weiner S., Addadi L., Light manipulation by guanine crystals in organisms: Biogenic scatterers, mirrors, multilayer reflectors and photonic crystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1603514 (2016).
  29. [32]Qiu X., Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat. Methods 14, 309– 315 (2017). 28114287 PMC5330805
  30. [33]Becht E., Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol. 10.1038/nbt.4314 (2018). 30531897 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [34]Fukamachi S., Sugimoto M., Mitani H., Shima A., Somatolactin selectively regulates proliferation and morphogenesis of neural-crest derived pigment cells in medaka. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 10661– 10666 (2004). 15249680 PMC489991
  32. [35]Odiorne J. M., The occurrence of guanophores in Fundulus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 19, 750– 754 (1933). 16577560 PMC1086146
  33. [36]Fries E. F., White pigmentary effectors (leucophores) in killifishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 28, 396– 401 (1942). 16588565 PMC1078501
  34. [37]Kalueff A. V.; Zebrafish Neuroscience Research Consortium, Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior 1.0 and beyond. Zebrafish 10, 70– 86 (2013). 23590400 PMC3629777
  35. [38]Salis P., Developmental and comparative transcriptomic identification of iridophore contribution to white barring in clownfish. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 32, 391– 402 (2019). 30633441 PMC6483885
  36. [39]Oliphant L. W., Hudon J., Pteridines as reflecting pigments and components of reflecting organelles in vertebrates. Pigment Cell Res. 6, 205– 208 (1993). 8248017
  37. [40]Ziegler I., The pteridine pathway in zebrafish: Regulation and specification during the determination of neural crest cell-fate. Pigment Cell Res. 16, 172– 182 (2003). 12753383
  38. [42]Dupin E., Real C., Glavieux-Pardanaud C., Vaigot P., Le Douarin N. M., Reversal of developmental restrictions in neural crest lineages: Transition from Schwann cells to glial-melanocytic precursors in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5229– 5233 (2003). 12702775 PMC154327
  39. [43]Takahashi K., Yamanaka S., A decade of transcription factor-mediated reprogramming to pluripotency. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 183– 193 (2016). 26883003
  40. [44]Sandoval-Guzmán T., Fundamental differences in dedifferentiation and stem cell recruitment during skeletal muscle regeneration in two salamander species. Cell Stem Cell 14, 174– 187 (2014). 24268695
  41. [46]Mort R. L., Jackson I. J., Patton E. E., The melanocyte lineage in development and disease. Development 142, 620– 632 (2015). 25670789 PMC4325379
  42. [47]Salis P., Ontogenetic and phylogenetic simplification during white stripe evolution in clownfishes. BMC Biol. 16, 90 (2018). 30180844 PMC6123960
  43. [48]Garcia C. M., Ramirez E., Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals. Nature 434, 501– 505 (2005). 15791255
  44. [50]Lang M. R., Patterson L. B., Gordon T. N., Johnson S. L., Parichy D. M., Basonuclin-2 requirements for zebrafish adult pigment pattern development and female fertility. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000744 (2009). 19956727 PMC2776513

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, V. M., Saunders, L. M., Larson, T. A., Bain, E. J., Sturiale, S. L., Gur, D., Chowdhury, S., Flynn, J. D., Allen, M. C., Deheyn, D. D., Lee, J. C., Simon, J. A., Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Raible, D. W., & Parichy, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147;
Corresponding author
Parichy, David M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
116
Issue
24
Pages
11806-11811
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2951370628
Cited by
69
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH R35 GM122471)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
leucophores, zebrafish, xanthophores, neural crest, cell fate specification, background matching, single-cell transcriptomics, organelle ultrastructure, mutation analysis
MeSH terms
Cell Plasticity, Animals, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Genetics, Population, Melanophores, Mutation, Neural Crest, Phenotype, Pigmentation, Zebrafish, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review