Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species

Open access
Montay-Gruel, Pierre, Acharya, Munjal M., Petersson, Kristoffer, Alikhani, Leila, Yakkala, Chakradhar, Allen, Barrett D., Ollivier, Jonathan, Petit, Benoit, Jorge, Patrik Gonçalves, Syage, Amber R., Nguyen, Thuan A., Baddour, Al Anoud D., Lu, Celine, Singh, Paramvir, Moeckli, Raphael, Bochud, François, Germond, Jean-François, Froidevaux, Pascal, Bailat, Claude, Bourhis, Jean, Vozenin, Marie-Catherine, Limoli, Charles L.·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Ultra-high dose-rate (≥100 Gy⋅s −1 ) irradiation, termed FLASH radiotherapy, affords some remarkable (if not unexpected) normal tissue sparing in the irradiated brain when compared with conventional dose rates (0.07–0.1 Gy⋅s −1 ) used in clinical practice. Radiation-induced neurocognitive deficits, persistent neuroinflammation, and the structural degradation of mature neurons, typical of conventional dose-rate exposures, were resolved significantly in a preclinical mouse model exposed to FLASH radiotherapy. These benefits persisted over a 6-mon postirradiation interval and were caused, in part, by a mechanism involving reduced reactive oxygen species. Since normal tissue injury during and following radiotherapy dictates the maximum tolerated dose, the capability to ameliorate these adverse side effects holds significant promise for improving therapeutic outcome for cancer survivors worldwide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1901777116

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Montay-Gruel, P., Acharya, M. M., Petersson, K., Alikhani, L., Yakkala, C., Allen, B. D., Ollivier, J., Petit, B., Jorge, P. G., Syage, A. R., Nguyen, T. A., Baddour, A. A. D., Lu, C., Singh, P., Moeckli, R., Bochud, F., Germond, J.-F., Froidevaux, P., Bailat, C., Bourhis, J., Vozenin, M.-C., & Limoli, C. L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-05-16
Volume
116
Issue
22
Pages
10943-10951
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2946753897
Cited by
599
References
5
FWCI
34.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1901777116
The paper
Montay-Gruel, P., Acharya, M. M., Petersson, K., Alikhani, L., Yakkala, C., Allen, B. D., Ollivier, J., Petit, B., Jorge, P. G., Syage, A. R., Nguyen, T. A., Baddour, A. A. D., Lu, C., Singh, P., Moeckli, R., Bochud, F., Germond, J.-F., Froidevaux, P., Bailat, C., . . . Limoli, C. L. (2019). Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901777116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.