Cited by 75Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeological and Geological StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

The composition of a Neandertal social group revealed by the hominin footprints at Le Rozel (Normandy, France)

Open access
Duveau, Jérémy, Berillon, Gilles, Verna, Christine, Laisné, Gilles, Cliquet, Dominique·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Footprints represent a unique snapshot of hominin life. They provide information on the size and composition of groups that differs from osteological and archeological remains, whose contemporaneity is difficult to establish. We report here on the discovery of 257 footprints dated to 80,000 y from the Paleolithic site at Le Rozel (Normandy, France), which represent the largest known Neandertal ichnological assemblage to date. We investigate the size and composition of a track-maker group from this large set by developing a morphometric method based on experimental footprints. Our analyses indicate that the footprints were made by a small group comprising different age classes, from early childhood to adult, with a majority of children. The Le Rozel footprints thus provide direct evidence for the size and composition of a Neandertal social group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1901789116

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One of the main differences between modern humans and Neanderthals has been the composition and size of social groups: Neanderthal groups were small (10-30 individuals), while modern humans developed complex societies.

    “one of the main differences between modern humans and Neanderthals has been the composition and size of social groups: while Neanderthal groups were small, composed of 10–30 individuals, modern humans developed complex societies (Duveau, et al. 2019).”

    From <i>DLX5/6</i> GABAergic Expression Affects Social Vocalization: Implications for Human Evolution (2021) · cites this paper as Duveau, et al. 2019

    The paper’s opening section says indirect estimates suggest Neandertal groups averaged 10–30 individuals per site, while cautioning that the estimates depend on uncertain assumptions. It does not establish the claimed contrast with modern humans or say that modern humans developed complex societies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duveau, J., Berillon, G., Verna, C., Laisné, G., & Cliquet, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • UMR 7194 Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique, CNRS, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Université Perpignan Via Domitia, 75013 Paris, France;
  • Ministère de la Culture (FR)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
116
Issue
39
Pages
19409-19414
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2973056189
Cited by
75
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
40.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ministère de la culture (CERFA 121-56*05)
  • Département de La Manche (CERFA 121-56*05)
  • Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (ED 227 (Doctoral grant))
  • French National Research Agency (ANR-18-CE27-0010-01 HoBIS)
  • CNRS INEE International Research Network (IRN-GDRI0870)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
Neanderthals, hominin footprints, social group composition, group size, age structure, ichnology, morphometrics, Paleolithic, hominin behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Archaeology, Foot, Fossils, France, Neanderthals, Sociological Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review