Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country
Open accessAbstract
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is a climate change mitigation policy in which rich countries provide payments to developing countries for protecting their forests. In 2009, the countries of Norway and Guyana entered into one of the first bilateral REDD+ programs, with Norway offering to pay US$250 million to Guyana if annual deforestation rates remained below 0.056% from 2010 to 2015. To quantify the impact of this national REDD+ program, we construct a counterfactual times-series trajectory of annual tree cover loss using synthetic matching. This analytical approach allows us to quantify tree cover loss that would have occurred in the absence of the Norway-Guyana REDD+ program. We found that the Norway-Guyana REDD+ program reduced tree cover loss by 35% during the implementation period (2010 to 2015), equivalent to 12.8 million tons of avoided CO 2 emissions. Our analysis indicates that national REDD+ payments attenuated the effect of increases in gold prices, an internationally traded commodity that is the primary deforestation driver in Guyana. Overall, we found strong evidence that the program met the additionality criteria of REDD+. However, we found that tree cover loss increased after the payments ended, and therefore, our results suggest that without continued payments, forest protection is not guaranteed. On the issue of leakage, which is complex and difficult to quantify, a multinational REDD+ program for a region could address leakage that results from differences in forest policies between neighboring countries.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Brazil, twelve REDD+ projects across the entire Brazilian Amazon focused on agriculturally-driven deforestation did not provide additionality in 2008-2018.
“In Brazil, twelve REDD+ projects across the entire Brazilian Amazon focused on 502 agriculturally-driven deforestation did not provide additionality (outcomes beyond business as usual) 503 in 2008-2018 [137].”
From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [137]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country
Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321455188 · Cited by 4,517 · see citing works
Generalized Synthetic Control Method: Causal Inference with Interactive Fixed Effects Models
Xu, Y. (2017) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2016.2 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [44]Y. le Polain de Waroux, R. D. Garrett, R. Heilmayr, E. F. Lambin, Land-use policies and corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113 , 4021 -4026 (2016).
- [56]A. Martius et al ., ' Pathway to Impact: Is REDD + a Viable Theory of Change? ' in Transforming REDD + : Lessons and New Directions , A. Angelsen et al ., Eds. (Center for International Forestry Research, 2018), pp. 17 -28.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests
Anderegg, W. R. L., Trugman, A. T., Badgley, G., Anderson, C. M., Bartuska, A., Ciais, P., Cullenward, D., Field, C. B., Freeman, J., Goetz, S. J., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz7005 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales
Zipper, S. C., Jaramillo, F., Wang‐Erlandsson, L., Cornell, S. E., Gleeson, T., Porkka, M., Häyhä, T., Crépin, A., Fetzer, I., Gerten, D., et al. (2020) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2019ef001377 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome
Hänggli, A., Levy, S. A., Armenteras, D., Bovolo, C. I., Brandão, J., Rueda, X., & Garrett, R. D. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acd408 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roopsind, A., Sohngen, B., & Brandt, J.
- Affiliations
- Boise State University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2019-11-18
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 24492-24499
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC6900633
- OpenAlex
- W2990180051
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (OIA: 18226801)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- REDD+, deforestation, tree cover loss, CO2 emissions, gold prices, additionality, leakage, synthetic control method, climate change mitigation, forest policy
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Guyana, International Cooperation, Models, Theoretical, Norway, Trees, Environmental Policy, Forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review