Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A selective membrane-targeting repurposed antibiotic with activity against persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Kim, Wooseong, Zou, Guijin, Hari, Taylor P. A., Wilt, Ingrid K., Zhu, Wenpeng, Galle, Nicolas, Faizi, Hammad A., Hendricks, Gabriel L., Tori, Katerina, Pan, Wen, Huang, Xiaowen, Steele, Andrew D., Csatary, Erika E., Dekarske, Madeline M., Rosen, Jake L., Ribeiro, Noelly de Queiroz, Lee, Kiho, Port, Jenna, Fuchs, Beth Burgwyn, Vlahovska, Petia M., Wuest, William M., Gao, Huajian, Ausubel, Frederick M., Mylonakis, Eleftherios·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: There is a critical lack of therapeutic agents to treat infections caused by nongrowing persister forms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Although membrane-disrupting agents can kill persister cells, their therapeutic potential has been mostly overlooked because of low selectivity for bacterial versus mammalian membranes. We report that the clinically approved anthelmintic drug bithionol kills MRSA persisters by disrupting membrane lipid bilayers at concentrations that exhibit low levels of toxicity to mammalian cells. The selectivity of bithionol results from the presence of cholesterol in mammalian but not in bacterial membranes. We also show that the antipersister potency of membrane-active antimicrobial agents correlates with their ability to increase membrane fluidity. Our results significantly enhance our understanding of bacterial membrane disruption and membrane selectivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1904700116

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Kim, W., Zou, G., Hari, T. P. A., Wilt, I. K., Zhu, W., Galle, N., Faizi, H. A., Hendricks, G. L., Tori, K., Pan, W., Huang, X., Steele, A. D., Csatary, E. E., Dekarske, M. M., Rosen, J. L., Ribeiro, N. D. Q., Lee, K., Port, J., Fuchs, B. B., Vlahovska, P. M., Wuest, W. M., Gao, H., Ausubel, F. M., & Mylonakis, E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
116
Issue
33
Pages
16529-16534
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2965339449
Cited by
207
References
2
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A selective membrane-targeting repurposed antibiotic with activity against persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1904700116
The paper
Kim, W., Zou, G., Hari, T. P. A., Wilt, I. K., Zhu, W., Galle, N., Faizi, H. A., Hendricks, G. L., Tori, K., Pan, W., Huang, X., Steele, A. D., Csatary, E. E., Dekarske, M. M., Rosen, J. L., Ribeiro, N. D. Q., Lee, K., Port, J., Fuchs, B. B., . . . Mylonakis, E. (2019). A selective membrane-targeting repurposed antibiotic with activity against persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904700116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.