Cited by 138Force Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsGraphene research and applications

Tuning friction to a superlubric state via in-plane straining

Open access
Zhang, Shuai, Hou, Yuan, Li, Suzhi, Liu, Luqi, Zhang, Zhong, Feng, Xi-Qiao, Li, Qunyang·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Controlling, and in many cases minimizing, friction is a goal that has long been pursued in history. From the classic Amontons–Coulomb law to the recent nanoscale experiments, the steady-state friction is found to be an inherent property of a sliding interface, which typically cannot be altered on demand. In this work, we show that the friction on a graphene sheet can be tuned reversibly by simple mechanical straining. In particular, by applying a tensile strain (up to 0.60%), we are able to achieve a superlubric state (coefficient of friction nearly 0.001) on a suspended graphene. Our atomistic simulations together with atomically resolved friction images reveal that the in-plane strain effectively modulates the flexibility of graphene. Consequently, the local pinning capability of the contact interface is changed, resulting in the unusual strain-dependent frictional behavior. This work demonstrates that the deformability of atomic-scale structures can provide an additional channel of regulating the friction of contact interfaces involving configurationally flexible materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1907947116

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. C. M. Mate, Tribology on the Small Scale (Oxford University Press, New York, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, S., Hou, Y., Li, S., Liu, L., Zhang, Z., Feng, X.-Q., & Li, Q.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Tribology (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Qunyang
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-10-28
Volume
116
Issue
49
Pages
24452-24456
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2982706077
Cited by
138
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772169, 11432008, 11832010, 11890682, 11890671)
  • ational Basic Research Program of China (2015CB351903)
  • National Science and Technology Major Project (2017-VI-0003-0073)
  • State Key Laboratory of Tribology at Tsinghua University (SKLT2019B02)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
Keywords
superlubricity, graphene, in-plane strain, tensile strain, suspended graphene, atomic-scale friction, deformable materials, atomistic simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review