Cited by 96Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchMarine and coastal ecosystems

A diurnal carbon engine explains 13 C-enriched carbonates without increasing the global production of oxygen

Open access
Geyman, Emily C., Maloof, Adam C.·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: We present stable carbon isotope ( δ 13 C) data from modern carbonate sediment that require a decoupling of the carbon cycles in the global ocean versus shallow carbonate shelves. This realization is important because, for the first 97% of Earth history, many inferences about global paleoclimate and seawater chemistry rely on interpretations of shallow carbonates. We use modern observations and a simple model to show how ordinary diurnal carbon cycling in shallow waters is sufficient to produce anomalously positive δ 13 C on shelves today, and in the geological record. Our results alleviate the need to interpret positive δ 13 C excursions in the geological record as global reorganizations of the carbon cycle and instead link δ 13 C to local and/or global paleoenvironmental and paleoecological controls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1908783116

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anomalously positive carbon isotope records during this time period likely point to high rates of primary productivity.

    “Anomalously positive carbon isotope records during this time period-whether they track a local or global signal (Geyman & Maloof 2019, Karhu & Holland 1996)-likely point to high rates of primary productivity.”

    From The History of Ocean Oxygenation (2022) · cites this paper as Geyman & Maloof 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geyman, E. C., & Maloof, A. C.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Geyman, Emily C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-11-08
Volume
116
Issue
49
Pages
24433-24439
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2987573093
Cited by
96
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1410317)
  • Meadows Foundation
  • Geological Society of America
  • Princeton University
  • High Meadows Foundation
  • Evolving Earth Foundation
  • Division of Earth Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
stable carbon isotopes, carbonate sediments, ocean carbon cycle, paleoclimate, paleoecology, oxygen production, carbon isotope excursion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review