Cited by 51Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural dynamics and brain functionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Arousal regulates frequency tuning in primary auditory cortex

Open access
Lin, Pei-Ann, Asinof, Samuel K., Edwards, Nicholas J., Isaacson, Jeffry S.·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Changes in brain state modulate how information is processed in sensory cortical areas. Here we use population imaging and intracellular recording to show that arousal regulates frequency tuning in layer 2/3 of primary auditory cortex. Increased arousal reduces lateral inhibition, broadens frequency tuning and enhances cortical representations of pure tones. Despite the arousal-dependent reduction in stimulus selectivity, frequency discrimination by cell ensembles improves due to a reduction in correlated variability (noise correlations).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1911383116

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Head-restrained preparations have shown that behavioral state fluctuations have a strong impact on neuronal gain and coding properties in primary sensory areas and modulate neuronal firing within brain-wide neuronal networks.

    “By employing head-restrained preparations, a growing body of work has demonstrated that behavioral state fluctuations have a strong impact on neuronal gain and coding properties in primary sensory areas36,43,66–70 and modulate neuronal firing within brain-wide neuronal networks44,71–74.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, P.-A., Asinof, S. K., Edwards, N. J., & Isaacson, J. S.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Isaacson, Jeffry S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-11-22
Volume
116
Issue
50
Pages
25304-25310
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2990271016
Cited by
51
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC04682, R01DC015239)
  • National Science Foundation (NSFGRP)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
arousal, primary auditory cortex, frequency tuning, lateral inhibition, layer 2/3, frequency discrimination, noise correlation, correlated variability, intracellular recording, brain states
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Arousal, Auditory Cortex, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Inhibition, Sound, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review