Cited by 57Protein Structure and DynamicsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisBiochemical and Structural Characterization

Computational design of closely related proteins that adopt two well-defined but structurally divergent folds

Open access
Wei, Kathy Y., Moschidi, Danai, Bick, Matthew J., Nerli, Santrupti, McShan, Andrew C., Carter, Lauren P., Huang, Po-Ssu, Fletcher, Daniel A. +3 more·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The plasticity of naturally occurring protein structures, which can change shape considerably in response to changes in environmental conditions, is critical to biological function. While computational methods have been used for de novo design of proteins that fold to a single state with a deep free-energy minimum [P.-S. Huang, S. E. Boyken, D. Baker, Nature 537, 320–327 (2016)], and to reengineer natural proteins to alter their dynamics [J. A. Davey, A. M. Damry, N. K. Goto, R. A. Chica, Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 1280–1285 (2017)] or fold [P. A. Alexander, Y. He, Y. Chen, J. Orban, P. N. Bryan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 21149–21154 (2009)], the de novo design of closely related sequences which adopt well-defined but structurally divergent structures remains an outstanding challenge. We designed closely related sequences (over 94% identity) that can adopt two very different homotrimeric helical bundle conformations—one short (∼66 Å height) and the other long (∼100 Å height)—reminiscent of the conformational transition of viral fusion proteins. Crystallographic and NMR spectroscopic characterization shows that both the short- and long-state sequences fold as designed. We sought to design bistable sequences for which both states are accessible, and obtained a single designed protein sequence that populates either the short state or the long state depending on the measurement conditions. The design of sequences which are poised to adopt two very different conformations sets the stage for creating large-scale conformational switches between structurally divergent forms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1914808117

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are examples of highly similar protein sequences having radically different structures and functions and of sequences that can form multiple folds.

    “Although it is generally believed that proteins with similar sequences form similar structures, there are also interesting examples of highly similar protein sequences having radically different structures and functions 60,61 and of sequences that can form multiple folds 62.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, K. Y., Moschidi, D., Bick, M. J., Nerli, S., McShan, A. C., Carter, L. P., Huang, P.-S., Fletcher, D. A., Sgourakis, N. G., Boyken, S. E., & Baker, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Boyken, Scott E.
  • Baker, David
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-03-18
Volume
117
Issue
13
Pages
7208-7215
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3012394013
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (S10OD018455)
  • Chan Zuckerberg (Biohub)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
de novo protein design, structural plasticity, conformational switching, protein folding, viral fusion protein, protein conformational change
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Molecular Conformation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Folding, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review