Regulation of spatiotemporal limits of developmental gene expression via enhancer grammar
Open accessAbstract
The regulatory specificity of a gene is determined by the structure of its enhancers, which contain multiple transcription factor binding sites. A unique combination of transcription factor binding sites in an enhancer determines the boundary of target gene expression, and their disruption often leads to developmental defects. Despite extensive characterization of binding motifs in an enhancer, it is still unclear how each binding site contributes to overall transcriptional activity. Using live imaging, quantitative analysis, and mathematical modeling, we measured the contribution of individual binding sites in transcriptional regulation. We show that binding site arrangement within the Rho-GTPase component t48 enhancer mediates the expression boundary by mainly regulating the timing of transcriptional activation along the dorsoventral axis of Drosophila embryos. By tuning the binding affinity of the Dorsal (Dl) and Zelda (Zld) sites, we show that single site modulations are sufficient to induce significant changes in transcription. Yet, no one site seems to have a dominant role; rather, multiple sites synergistically drive increases in transcriptional activity. Interestingly, Dl and Zld demonstrate distinct roles in transcriptional regulation. Dl site modulations change spatial boundaries of t48 , mostly by affecting the timing of activation and bursting frequency rather than transcriptional amplitude or bursting duration. However, modulating the binding site for the pioneer factor Zld affects both the timing of activation and amplitude, suggesting that Zld may potentiate higher Dl recruitment to target DNAs. We propose that such fine-tuning of dynamic gene control via enhancer structure may play an important role in ensuring normal development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Flexible enhancer grammar ensures robust gene expression control through suboptimal transcription factor binding motifs, which reinforce the requirement for transcription factor cooperativity and create opportunities for fine-tuning enhancer activity levels.
“Another means by which flexible enhancer grammar ensures robust gene expression control is through “suboptimal” TF binding motifs, which reinforce the requirement for TF cooperativity and create opportunities for fine-tuning enhancer activity levels [125–128].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [128]
Cites
Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells
Raj, A., Peskin, C. S., Tranchina, D., Vargas, D. Y., & Tyagi, S. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
How the Dorsal gradient works: Insights from postgenome technologies
Hong, J.-W., Hendrix, D. A., Papatsenko, D., & Levine, M. S. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806476105 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters
Ray-Jones, H., & Spivakov, M. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03903-w · Cited by 81 · see citing works
- Authors
- Keller, S. H., Jena, S. G., Yamazaki, Y., & Lim, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Kansai Electric Power (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, Bomyi
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2020-06-15
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 15096-15103
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC7334449
- OpenAlex
- W3035054816
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (F31AR075398, R35GM133425)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- transcription factor binding sites, Dorsal, Zelda, Rho GTPases, transcriptional bursting, pioneer factors, dorsal-ventral axis, Drosophila embryo, developmental gene regulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Female, Male, Nuclear Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila Proteins, Spatio-Temporal Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review