The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in multiple sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
Size and ascertainment constraints often limit twin studies to concordance comparisons between identical and fraternal twins. Here we report the final results of a longitudinal, population-based study of twins with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Canada. Bias was demonstrably minimized, and an estimated 75% of all Canadian MS twin pairs were ascertained, giving a sample sufficiently large (n= 370) to permit additional informative comparisons. Twinning was not found to affect prevalence, and twins with MS did not differ from nontwins for DR15 allele frequency nor for MS risk to their siblings. Probandwise concordance rates of 25.3% (SE ± 4.4) for monozygotic (MZ), 5.4% (±2.8) for dizygotic (DZ), and 2.9% (±0.6) for their nontwin siblings were found. MZ twin concordance was in excess of DZ twin concordance. The excess concordance in MZ was derived primarily from like-sexed female pairs with a probandwise concordance rate of 34 of 100 (34 ± 5.7%) compared with 3 of 79 (3.8 ± 2.8%) for female DZ pairs. We did not demonstrate an MZ/DZ difference in males, although the sample size was small. We observed a 2-fold increase in risk to DZ twins over nontwin siblings of twins, but the difference was not significant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proinflammatory T-cell responses to gut microbiota promote experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
Lee, Y. K., Menezes, J. S., Umesaki, Y., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000082107 · Cited by 1,323
Gender differences in autoimmune disease
Ngo, S. T., Steyn, F. J., & McCombe, P. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.04.004 · Cited by 1,074
for the Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Group, Gregory, S. G., Schmidt, S., Seth, P., Oksenberg, J. R., Hart, J., Prokop, A., Caillier, S. J., Ban, M., Goris, A., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2103 · Cited by 657
Luczynski, P., McVey Neufeld, K.-A., Oriach, C. S., Clarke, G., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2016) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyw020 · Cited by 632
Genetics of multiple sclerosis
Dyment, D. A., Ebers, G. C., & Dessa Sadovnick, A. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00663-x · Cited by 563
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Willer, C. J., Dyment, D. A., Risch, N. J., Sadovnick, A. D., Ebers, G. C., & The Canadian Collaborative Study Group§§
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-10-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12877-12882
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2009701030
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1932604100
- The paper
- Willer, C. J., Dyment, D. A., Risch, N. J., Sadovnick, A. D., Ebers, G. C., & The Canadian Collaborative Study Group§§. (2003). Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1932604100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.