Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex

Open access
Carvalho, Ana L., Dias, Fernando M. V., Prates, José A. M., Nagy, Tibor, Gilbert, Harry J., Davies, Gideon J., Ferreira, Luís M. A., Romão, Maria J., Fontes, Carlos M. G. A.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The utilization of organized supramolecular assemblies to exploit the synergistic interactions afforded by close proximity, both for enzymatic synthesis and for the degradation of recalcitrant substrates, is an emerging theme in cellular biology. Anaerobic bacteria harness a multiprotein complex, termed the “cellulosome,” for efficient degradation of the plant cell wall. This megadalton catalytic machine organizes an enzymatic consortium on a multifaceted molecular scaffold whose “cohesin” domains interact with corresponding “dockerin” domains of the enzymes. Here we report the structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex from Clostridium thermocellum at 2.2-Å resolution. The data show that the β-sheet cohesin domain interacts predominantly with one of the helices of the dockerin. Whereas the structure of the cohesin remains essentially unchanged, the loop–helix–helix–loop–helix motif of the dockerin undergoes conformational change and ordering compared with its solution structure, although the classical 12-residue EF-hand coordination to two calcium ions is maintained. Significantly, internal sequence duplication within the dockerin is manifested in near-perfect internal twofold symmetry, suggesting that both “halves” of the dockerin may interact with cohesins in a similar manner, thus providing a higher level of structure to the cellulosome and possibly explaining the presence of “polycellulosomes.” The structure provides an explanation for the lack of cross-species recognition between cohesin–dockerin pairs and thus provides a blueprint for the rational design, construction, and exploitation of these catalytic assemblies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1936124100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Carvalho, A. L., Dias, F. M. V., Prates, J. A. M., Nagy, T., Gilbert, H. J., Davies, G. J., Ferreira, L. M. A., Romão, M. J., & Fontes, C. M. G. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-11-17
Volume
100
Issue
24
Pages
13809-13814
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2018337406
Cited by
259
References
0
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1936124100
The paper
Carvalho, A. L., Dias, F. M. V., Prates, J. A. M., Nagy, T., Gilbert, H. J., Davies, G. J., Ferreira, L. M. A., Romão, M. J., & Fontes, C. M. G. A. (2003). Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin–dockerin complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1936124100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.