Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for aggregation-independent, PrP C -mediated Aβ cellular internalization

Foley, Alejandro R., Roseman, Graham P., Chan, Ka, Smart, Amanda, Finn, Thomas S., Yang, Kevin, Lokey, R. Scott, Millhauser, Glenn L., Raskatov, Jevgenij A.·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Amyloid β (Aβ) aggregation has been the therapeutic target of several Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical trials. Aβ exists in many different aggregated forms, making it exceedingly challenging to target. Evidence links intracellular Aβ accumulation and AD pathogenesis. We report that amino acids 1 to 30 of Aβ, Aβ (1–30), do not aggregate yet display cellular uptake stereospecificity when compared to its mirror image, suggesting that Aβ uptake is predominantly receptor-mediated and may be independent from its aggregation state. Additionally, we found Aβ (1–30) internalization to depend on PrP C expression. Aβ (1–30) thus represents a powerful tool to study mechanisms of Aβ cellular internalization and suggests that Aβ uptake could be modulated by therapeutically targeting high-affinity Aβ receptors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2009238117

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113613 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nrm2101 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1079469 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00434-3 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nm.1868 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.01.015 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1605104113 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41598-017-02227-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00460-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.M112.400358 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41467-018-07699-5 · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0395-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/brain/awt375 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/brain/awv356 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/anie.201706279 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/cbic.201800708 · DOI
  17. Z. Y. Wang ., Knockdown of prion protein (PrP) by RNA interference weakens the protective activity of wild-type PrP against copper ion and antagonizes the cytotoxicity of fCJD-associated PrP mutants in cultured cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 28, 413–421 (2011).
  18. 10.1074/jbc.M116.762526 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.009 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4761 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1112600108 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7437 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.10.012 · DOI
  24. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003319 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M112.423954 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/bs.apha.2017.09.007 · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154326 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00646 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/ncomms1341 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159119 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1242077 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1459-11.2011 · DOI
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1327-16.2016 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/bi971843e · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41557-018-0031-x · DOI
  36. 10.1074/jbc.M115.691840 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/sciadv.1600947 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.1618417114 · DOI
  39. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00362 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s40263-020-00737-1 · DOI
  41. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021456 · DOI
  42. G. P. Roseman “The central region of the cellular prion protein attenuates the intrinsic toxicity of N-terminus ” PhD thesis University of California Santa Cruz CA (2019).
  43. 10.1016/j.str.2016.04.017 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.str.2012.12.002 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF00197809 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Foley, A. R., Roseman, G. P., Chan, K., Smart, A., Finn, T. S., Yang, K., Lokey, R. S., Millhauser, G. L., & Raskatov, J. A.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-11-02
Volume
117
Issue
46
Pages
28625-28631
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
38
References
15
Language
en
Funders
HHS | National Institutes of Health (2R25GM058903-20-IMSD, R21AG058074, R35GM131781, S10OD024980, S10OD018455, GM131135)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review