Cited by 18Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Short-term forecasts of expected deaths

Open access
Rizzi, Silvia, Vaupel, James W.·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: We introduce a simple but powerful method for analyzing mortality after a major shock. We apply the method to show, more conclusively than up to now, that Denmark, which imposed a lockdown during the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic, suffered considerably lower risks of death than Sweden, which did not impose a lockdown. Our method makes short-term forecasts of the number of deaths that would have occurred if the coronavirus pandemic or other health catastrophe had not occurred. By subtracting the forecast counts from actual death counts, excess mortality can be estimated. This can be done by age, sex, and other characteristics. The method can also be used for other kinds of short-term forecasting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2025324118

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizzi, S., & Vaupel, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Vaupel, James W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-03-26
Volume
118
Issue
15
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3137336626
Cited by
18
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • ROCKWOOL Foundation (Excess Death Grant)
  • AXA Research Fund (AXA Chair in Longevity Research)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
excess mortality, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown policy, Denmark, Sweden, prediction intervals
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Denmark, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Sweden, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review