Cited by 16Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersMemory and Neural Mechanisms

MAGUKs are essential, but redundant, in long-term potentiation

Open access
Chen, Xiumin, Fukata, Yuko, Fukata, Masaki, Nicoll, Roger A.·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

This study presents evidence that the MAGUK family of synaptic scaffolding proteins plays an essential, but redundant, role in long-term potentiation (LTP). The action of PSD-95, but not that of SAP102, requires the binding to the transsynaptic adhesion protein ADAM22, which is required for nanocolumn stabilization. Based on these and previous results, we propose a two-step process in the recruitment of AMPARs during LTP. First, AMPARs, via TARPs, bind to exposed PSD-95 in the PSD. This alone is not adequate to enhance synaptic transmission. Second, the AMPAR/TARP/PSD-95 complex is stabilized in the nanocolumn by binding to ADAM22. A second, ADAM22-independent pathway is proposed for SAP102.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2107585118

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AMPARs form discrete clusters scattered around the PSD.

    “AMPARs form discrete clusters scattered around the PSD (256–259).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [259]

  • Activity-dependent synaptic recruitment of AMPARs may involve two steps: delivery to the PSD, then addition to AMPAR clusters in the nanocolumn.

    “It is suggested that activity-dependent synaptic recruitment of AMPARs may involve two steps (259, 261). First, AMPARs are delivered to the PSD, but this is not enough to increase synaptic strength. Second, the newly recruited AMPARs are added to AMPAR clusters in the nanocolumn.”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [259]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., Fukata, Y., Fukata, M., & Nicoll, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • National Institutes of Natural Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Nicoll, Roger A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
118
Issue
28
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3181637521
Cited by
16
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H06413, 19K22439, 19K22548, 20H00459, 19H03331, 21K19390)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH117139)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
long-term potentiation, PSD-95, SAP102, ADAM22, TARP, synaptic scaffolding, synaptic transmission
MeSH terms
Disks Large Homolog 4 Protein, Animals, Membrane Proteins, Models, Biological, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Long-Term Potentiation, Protein Transport, Mice, Guanylate Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review