Cited by 94Neuroscience and Music PerceptionSocial Representations and IdentityCategorization, perception, and language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Narratives imagined in response to instrumental music reveal culture-bounded intersubjectivity

Open access
Margulis, Elizabeth H., Wong, Patrick C. M., Turnbull, Cara, Kubit, Benjamin M., McAuley, J. Devin·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Are we all imagining the same thing when we listen to music, or are our experiences hopelessly subjective? This research analyzes the similarity of responses from 622 participants in three locations on a highly unconstrained task: free-response descriptions of the stories they imagined while listening to instrumental music. Strikingly, participants in two separate locations that share an overarching culture imagine highly similar narratives to individual excerpts. But these similarity patterns do not extend to narratives imagined by participants in a third location with a distinct culture. This work shows that music—often considered an “abstract stimulus”—can trigger shared stories in listeners’ minds but that this intersubjectivity depends on a shared underlying culture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2110406119

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants from the same culture produced more similar narratives than participants from different cultures.

    “A clear pattern emerged: Participants from the same culture (Arkansas and Michigan) produced more similar narratives than participants from different cultures (Arkansas and Dimen; Michigan and Dimen).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Margulis et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. R. Herbert, Everyday Music Listening: Absorption, Dissociation and Trancing (Ashgate, 2011).
  2. 10.1017/9781108580298.013 · DOI
  3. 10.1057/s41599-019-0363-1 · DOI
  4. 10.1525/mp.2021.38.5.509 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104712 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.0610561104 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/mila.12097 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/1413350 · DOI
  9. P. Tagg, R. Clarida, Ten Little Title Tunes: Towards a Musicology of the Mass Media (Mass Media Music Scholars’ Press, 2003).
  10. 10.1525/mp.2015.33.2.217 · DOI
  11. 10.1525/mp.2017.35.2.235 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nn1197 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002226 · DOI
  14. S. Koelsch, Towards a neural basis of processing musical semantics. Phys. Life Rev. 8, 89–105 (2011).
  15. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01134.x · DOI
  16. 10.1017/9781108580298.035 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/3332901 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S0140525X20000333 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/mtp/23.1.45 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03140.x · DOI
  21. 10.1093/mtp/12.2.125 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/jmt/38.1.51 · DOI
  23. S. R. Ramsey, The Languages of China (Princeton University Press, 1999).
  24. A. Kassabian, Hearing Film: Tracking Identifications in Contemporary Hollywood Film Music (Routledge, 2001).
  25. 10.1002/asi.4630270302 · DOI
  26. D. Loughridge, ‘Always already technological’: New views of music and the human in musicology and the cognitive sciences. Music Res. Annu. 2, 1–22.
  27. 10.1525/mp.2020.37.3.185 · DOI
  28. N. Wiltsher, A. Meskin, “Art and imagination” in The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Imagination, A. Kind, Ed. (Routledge, 2016), pp. 179–191.
  29. 10.1037/xap0000034 · DOI
  30. A. Gabrielsson, Strong Experiences with Music: Music Is Much More Than Just Music (Oxford University Press, 2011).
  31. 10.1080/09658211.2015.1061012 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1037/xge0001050 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/40285811 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1468-5584.2004.00265.x · DOI
  35. 10.1037/a0031388 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1910704117 · DOI
  37. 10.1097/00001756-199403000-00027 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nn.2726 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/brain/awu145 · DOI
  40. S. Bird, E. Klein, E. Loper, Natural Language Processing with Python (O’Reilly Media, 2009).
  41. R. Řehůřekm P. Sojka “Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora” in Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks (ELRA 2010) pp. 45–50.
  42. F. Pedregosa , Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
  43. 10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0 · DOI
  44. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002141 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41562-020-00985-7 · DOI
  46. 10.2307/2532216 · DOI
  47. C. Szegedy Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv [Preprint] (2014). https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199 (Accessed 18 December 2021). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Margulis, E. H., Wong, P. C. M., Turnbull, C., Kubit, B. M., & McAuley, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Margulis, Elizabeth H.
  • McAuley, J. Devin
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-01-21
Volume
119
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4206917237
Cited by
94
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1734025, 1734063)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
music semantics, instrumental music, intersubjectivity, music as universal language, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Culture, Humans, Imagination, Music, Semantics, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review