Cited by 19Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The pathogenic R5L mutation disrupts formation of Tau complexes on the microtubule by altering local N-terminal structure

Open access
Cario, Alisa, Savastano, Adriana, Wood, Neil B., Liu, Zhu, Previs, Michael J., Hendricks, Adam G., Zweckstetter, Markus, Berger, Christopher L.·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance: The microtubule-associated protein Tau is strongly linked to a number of neurological diseases. Disease onset is typically associated with weakened interaction with the microtubule, but this widely accepted model is based on hyperphosphorylation or mutations within the C-terminal microtubule-binding domain of Tau. Here, we find that an N-terminal disease-associated mutation in Tau, R5L, does not reduce Tau affinity for microtubules but instead, modifies the N-terminal structure, altering Tau’s behavior and ability to condense on the microtubule surface. Our findings challenge the current paradigms of both how mutations in Tau lead to disease and the functional role of the N-terminal region of Tau.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2114215119

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pathogenic R5L mutation in the phosphatase-activating domain (PAD) disrupts cooperative binding by altering the structure of the N-terminal projection domain without affecting the microtubule-binding repeats or tau's microtubule affinity.

    “the pathogenic R5L mutation in the phosphatase-activating domain (PAD) disrupts cooperative binding by altering the structure of the N-terminal projection domain without affecting the microtubule-binding repeats or tau's microtubule affinity”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. [1]D. Panda, J. C. Samuel, M. Massie, S. C. Feinstein, L. Wilson, Differential regulation of microtubule dynamics by three- and four-repeat tau: Implications for the onset of neurodegenerative disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 9548– 9553 (2003). 12886013 PMC170955
  2. [2]D. B. Murphy, K. A. Johnson, G. G. Borisy, Role of tubulin-associated proteins in microtubule nucleation and elongation. J. Mol. Biol. 117, 33– 52 (1977). 599568
  3. [3]G. J. Hoeprich, A. R. Thompson, D. P. McVicker, W. O. Hancock, C. L. Berger, Kinesin’s neck-linker determines its ability to navigate obstacles on the microtubule surface. Biophys. J. 106, 1691– 1700 (2014). 24739168 PMC4008791
  4. [4]D. P. McVicker, L. R. Chrin, C. L. Berger, The nucleotide-binding state of microtubules modulates kinesin processivity and the ability of tau to inhibit kinesin-mediated transport. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 42873– 42880 (2011). 22039058 PMC3234877
  5. [5]M. Vershinin, B. C. Carter, D. S. Razafsky, S. J. King, S. P. Gross, Multiple-motor based transport and its regulation by tau. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 87– 92 (2007). 17190808 PMC1765483
  6. [7]N. M. Kanaan, Phosphorylation in the amino terminus of tau prevents inhibition of anterograde axonal transport. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 826.e15– 826.e30 (2012). PMC3272324 21794954
  7. [8]N. M. Kanaan, Pathogenic forms of tau inhibit kinesin-dependent axonal transport through a mechanism involving activation of axonal phosphotransferases. J. Neurosci. 31, 9858– 9868 (2011). 21734277 PMC3391724
  8. [9]I. Grundke-Iqbal, Microtubule-associated protein tau. A component of Alzheimer paired helical filaments. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 6084– 6089 (1986). 3084478
  9. [10]B. Borroni, Tau forms in CSF as a reliable biomarker for progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 71, 1796– 1803 (2008). 18971445
  10. [11]B. Borroni, Tau haplotype influences cerebral perfusion pattern in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related disorders. Acta Neurol. Scand. 117, 359– 366 (2008). 18177439
  11. [12]M. Goedert, C. M. Wischik, R. A. Crowther, J. E. Walker, A. Klug, Cloning and sequencing of the cDNA encoding a core protein of the paired helical filament of Alzheimer disease: Identification as the microtubule-associated protein tau. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 4051– 4055 (1988). 3131773 PMC280359
  12. [13]C. M. Wischik, Isolation of a fragment of tau derived from the core of the paired helical filament of Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 4506– 4510 (1988). 3132715 PMC280459
  13. [15]E. M. Mandelkow, Tau domains, phosphorylation, and interactions with microtubules. Neurobiol. Aging 16, 355– 362 (1995). 7566345
  14. [16]B. Zhang, Microtubule-binding drugs offset tau sequestration by stabilizing microtubules and reversing fast axonal transport deficits in a tauopathy model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 227– 231 (2005). 15615853 PMC544048
  15. [17]M. Goedert, Tau gene mutations and their effects. Mov. Disord. 20 (suppl. 12), S45– S52 (2005). 16092090
  16. [18]K. H. Strang, T. E. Golde, B. I. Giasson, MAPT mutations, tauopathy, and mechanisms of neurodegeneration. Lab. Invest. 99, 912– 928 (2019). 30742061 PMC7289372
  17. [19]M. D. Weingarten, A. H. Lockwood, S. Y. Hwo, M. W. Kirschner, A protein factor essential for microtubule assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 1858– 1862 (1975). 1057175 PMC432646
  18. [20]J. Avila, J. J. Lucas, M. Perez, F. Hernandez, Role of tau protein in both physiological and pathological conditions. Physiol. Rev. 84, 361– 384 (2004). 15044677
  19. [21]B. L. Goode, M. Chau, P. E. Denis, S. C. Feinstein, Structural and functional differences between 3-repeat and 4-repeat tau isoforms. Implications for normal tau function and the onset of neurodegenetative disease. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38182– 38189 (2000). 10984497
  20. [22]M. Goedert, M. G. Spillantini, R. Jakes, D. Rutherford, R. A. Crowther, Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: Sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 3, 519– 526 (1989). 2484340
  21. [23]H. Kadavath, Folding of the tau protein on microtubules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 10347– 10351 (2015). 26094605
  22. [24]M. D. Mukrasch, The “jaws” of the tau-microtubule interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12230– 12239 (2007). 17307736
  23. [25]H. Kadavath, Tau stabilizes microtubules by binding at the interface between tubulin heterodimers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7501– 7506 (2015). 26034266 PMC4475932
  24. [26]B. L. Goode, Functional interactions between the proline-rich and repeat regions of tau enhance microtubule binding and assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 353– 365 (1997). 9190213 PMC276085
  25. [27]N. Gustke, B. Trinczek, J. Biernat, E. M. Mandelkow, E. Mandelkow, Domains of tau protein and interactions with microtubules. Biochemistry 33, 9511– 9522 (1994). 8068626
  26. [28]B. Trinczek, J. Biernat, K. Baumann, E. M. Mandelkow, E. Mandelkow, Domains of tau protein, differential phosphorylation, and dynamic instability of microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 1887– 1902 (1995). 8590813 PMC366657
  27. [29]E. H. Kellogg, Near-atomic model of microtubule-tau interactions. Science 360, 1242– 1246 (2018). 29748322 PMC6225777
  28. [30]K. M. McKibben, E. Rhoades, Independent tubulin binding and polymerization by the proline-rich region of tau is regulated by tau’s N-terminal domain. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 19381– 19394 (2019). 31699899 PMC6916478
  29. [31]A. M. Melo, A functional role for intrinsic disorder in the tau-tubulin complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 14336– 14341 (2016). 27911791 PMC5167143
  30. [32]M. H. Hinrichs, Tau protein diffuses along the microtubule lattice. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 38559– 38568 (2012). 23019339 PMC3493901
  31. [33]D. P. McVicker, G. J. Hoeprich, A. R. Thompson, C. L. Berger, Tau interconverts between diffusive and stable populations on the microtubule surface in an isoform and lattice specific manner. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 71, 184– 194 (2014). 24520046 PMC4154625
  32. [34]V. Siahaan, Kinetically distinct phases of tau on microtubules regulate kinesin motors and severing enzymes. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1086– 1092 (2019). 31481789
  33. [35]R. Tan, Microtubules gate tau condensation to spatially regulate microtubule functions. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1078– 1085 (2019). 31481790 PMC6748660
  34. [36]M. T. Gyparaki, Tau forms oligomeric complexes on microtubules that are distinct from tau aggregates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2021461118 (2021). 33952699 PMC8126857
  35. [37]A. Deshpande, K. M. Win, J. Busciglio, Tau isoform expression and regulation in human cortical neurons. FASEB J. 22, 2357– 2367 (2008). 18263702
  36. [38]P. Poorkaj, An R5L tau mutation in a subject with a progressive supranuclear palsy phenotype. Ann. Neurol. 52, 511– 516 (2002). 12325083
  37. [39]Y. Mutreja, B. Combs, T. C. Gamblin, FTDP-17 mutations alter the aggregation and microtubule stabilization propensity of tau in an isoform-specific fashion. Biochemistry 58, 742– 754 (2019). 30562452
  38. [40]P. Poorkaj, Tau is a candidate gene for chromosome 17 frontotemporal dementia. Ann. Neurol. 43, 815– 825 (1998). 9629852
  39. [41]B. L. Goode, S. C. Feinstein, Identification of a novel microtubule binding and assembly domain in the developmentally regulated inter-repeat region of tau. J. Cell Biol. 124, 769– 782 (1994). 8120098 PMC2119949
  40. [42]K. A. Butner, M. W. Kirschner, Tau protein binds to microtubules through a flexible array of distributed weak sites. J. Cell Biol. 115, 717– 730 (1991). 1918161 PMC2289193
  41. [43]J. L. Stern, D. V. Lessard, G. J. Hoeprich, G. A. Morfini, C. L. Berger, Phosphoregulation of Tau modulates inhibition of kinesin-1 motility. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 1079– 1087 (2017). 28251926 PMC5391184
  42. [44]A. R. Duan, Interactions between tau and different conformations of tubulin: Implications for tau function and mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 1424– 1438 (2017). 28322917
  43. [45]B. T. Castle, K. M. McKibben, E. Rhoades, D. J. Odde, Tau avoids the GTP cap at growing microtubule plus-ends. iScience 23, 101782 (2020). 33294790 PMC7691178
  44. [46]S. M. Kelly, T. J. Jess, N. C. Price, How to study proteins by circular dichroism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1751, 119– 139 (2005). 16027053
  45. [47]S. Kosol, S. Contreras-Martos, C. Cedeño, P. Tompa, Structural characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Molecules 18, 10802– 10828 (2013). 24008243 PMC6269831
  46. [48]M. D. Mukrasch, Structural polymorphism of 441-residue tau at single residue resolution. PLoS Biol. 7, e34 (2009). 19226187 PMC2642882
  47. [49]M. Mayer, B. Meyer, Characterization of ligand binding by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 38, 1784– 1788 (1999). 29711196
  48. [50]S. Walpole, S. Monaco, R. Nepravishta, J. Angulo, STD NMR as a technique for ligand screening and structural studies. Methods Enzymol. 615, 423– 451 (2019). 30638536
  49. [51]H. Kadavath, The binding mode of a tau peptide with tubulin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 3246– 3250 (2018). 29314492
  50. [52]S. Barghorn, Structure, microtubule interactions, and paired helical filament aggregation by tau mutants of frontotemporal dementias. Biochemistry 39, 11714– 11721 (2000). 10995239
  51. [53]I. D’Souza, Missense and silent tau gene mutations cause frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism-chromosome 17 type, by affecting multiple alternative RNA splicing regulatory elements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5598– 5603 (1999). 10318930 PMC21906
  52. [54]M. Hong, Mutation-specific functional impairments in distinct tau isoforms of hereditary FTDP-17. Science 282, 1914– 1917 (1998). 9836646
  53. [55]M. Hasegawa, M. J. Smith, M. Goedert, Tau proteins with FTDP-17 mutations have a reduced ability to promote microtubule assembly. FEBS Lett. 437, 207– 210 (1998). 9824291
  54. [56]P. Rizzu, Mutation-dependent aggregation of tau protein and its selective depletion from the soluble fraction in brain of P301L FTDP-17 patients. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 3075– 3082 (2000). 11115852
  55. [57]S. Jeganathan, M. von Bergen, H. Brutlach, H. J. Steinhoff, E. Mandelkow, Global hairpin folding of tau in solution. Biochemistry 45, 2283– 2293 (2006). 16475817
  56. [58]M. Schwalbe, Predictive atomic resolution descriptions of intrinsically disordered hTau40 and α-synuclein in solution from NMR and small angle scattering. Structure 22, 238– 249 (2014). 24361273
  57. [59]K. J. Rosenberg, J. L. Ross, H. E. Feinstein, S. C. Feinstein, J. Israelachvili, Complementary dimerization of microtubule-associated tau protein: Implications for microtubule bundling and tau-mediated pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 7445– 7450 (2008). 18495933 PMC2396711
  58. [60]M. Schwalbe, Structural impact of tau phosphorylation at threonine 231. Structure 23, 1448– 1458 (2015). 26165593
  59. [61]H. E. Feinstein, Oligomerization of the microtubule-associated protein tau is mediated by its N-terminal sequences: Implications for normal and pathological tau action. J. Neurochem. 137, 939– 954 (2016). 26953146 PMC4899250
  60. [62]N. Hirokawa, Y. Shiomura, S. Okabe, Tau proteins: The molecular structure and mode of binding on microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1449– 1459 (1988). 3139677 PMC2115262
  61. [63]L. Balabanian, C. L. Berger, A. G. Hendricks, Acetylated microtubules are preferentially bundled leading to enhanced kinesin-1 motility. Biophys. J. 113, 1551– 1560 (2017). 28978447 PMC5627185
  62. [64]A. R. Chaudhary, F. Berger, C. L. Berger, A. G. Hendricks, Tau directs intracellular trafficking by regulating the forces exerted by kinesin and dynein teams. Traffic 19, 111– 121 (2018). 29077261 PMC5783771
  63. [65]C. L. Berger, D. V. Lessard, The microtubule associated protein tau regulates KIF1A pausing behavior and motility. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2021). 10.1101/2021.08.11.455914 (Accessed 12 August 2021). · DOI
  64. [66]P. J. Hooikaas, MAP7 family proteins regulate kinesin-1 recruitment and activation. J. Cell Biol. 218, 1298– 1318 (2019). 30770434 PMC6446838
  65. [67]B. Y. Monroy, Competition between microtubule-associated proteins directs motor transport. Nat. Commun. 9, 1487 (2018). 29662074 PMC5902456
  66. [68]J. Chen, Y. Kanai, N. J. Cowan, N. Hirokawa, Projection domains of MAP2 and tau determine spacings between microtubules in dendrites and axons. Nature 360, 674– 677 (1992). 1465130
  67. [69]G. Šimić, Tau protein hyperphosphorylation and aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies, and possible neuroprotective strategies. Biomolecules 6, 6 (2016). 26751493 PMC4808800
  68. [70]T. C. Gamblin, In vitro polymerization of tau protein monitored by laser light scattering: Method and application to the study of FTDP-17 mutants. Biochemistry 39, 6136– 6144 (2000). 10821687
  69. [71]E. Chang, S. Kim, H. Yin, H. N. Nagaraja, J. Kuret, Pathogenic missense MAPT mutations differentially modulate tau aggregation propensity at nucleation and extension steps. J. Neurochem. 107, 1113– 1123 (2008). 18803694 PMC2596975
  70. [72]M. Castoldi, A. V. Popov, Purification of brain tubulin through two cycles of polymerization-depolymerization in a high-molarity buffer. Protein Expr. Purif. 32, 83– 88 (2003). 14680943
  71. [73]R. A. Charafeddine, Tau repeat regions contain conserved histidine residues that modulate microtubule-binding in response to changes in pH. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 8779– 8790 (2019). 30992364 PMC6552421

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cario, A., Savastano, A., Wood, N. B., Liu, Z., Previs, M. J., Hendricks, A. G., Zweckstetter, M., & Berger, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Berger, Christopher L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-02-08
Volume
119
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4220720205
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Vermont
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 787679)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TP B2), SFB 860)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R00HL124041)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM132646)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
tau protein, progressive supranuclear palsy, intrinsically disordered proteins, microtubule binding, projection domain, tau aggregation, microtubule-associated proteins
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Microtubules, Mutation, tau Proteins, Amino Acid Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review