Cited by 67Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringInflammasome and immune disordersNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Prevention of the foreign body response to implantable medical devices by inflammasome inhibition

Open access
Barone, Damiano G., Carnicer-Lombarte, Alejandro, Tourlomousis, Panagiotis, Hamilton, Russell S., Prater, Malwina, Rutz, Alexandra L., Dimov, Ivan B., Malliaras, George G. +5 more·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Implantable electronic medical devices (IEMDs) are used for some clinical applications, representing an exciting prospect for the transformative treatment of intractable conditions such Parkinson’s disease, deafness, and paralysis. The use of IEMDs is limited at the moment because, over time, a foreign body reaction (FBR) develops at the device–neural interface such that ultimately the IEMD fails and needs to be removed. Here, we show that macrophage nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activity drives the FBR in a nerve injury model yet integration of an NLRP3 inhibitor into the device prevents FBR while allowing full healing of damaged neural tissue to occur.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2115857119

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chronic stage is predominantly mediated by macrophages and foreign body giant cells, which are generated from the fused macrophages.

    “This stage is predominantly mediated by macrophages and foreign body giant cells, which are generated from the fused macrophages.”

    From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [207]

    The Discussion names macrophages and foreign body giant cells among cells recruited during the foreign body response, and says macrophages activate fibroblasts that mediate fibrosis. It does not say that macrophages and giant cells predominantly mediate the chronic stage or that giant cells form by macrophage fusion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Macrophages, by crosstalk with the myofibroblasts, regulate the degradation of the implanted material and also coordinate the formation of granulation tissue, which is the precursor for fibrous capsule development.

    “Macrophages, by crosstalk with the myofibroblasts, regulate the degradation of the implanted material and also coordinate the formation of granulation tissue, which is the precursor for fibrous capsule development [207].”

    From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [207]

    The Discussion says macrophages activate acta2-expressing fibroblasts that mediate fibrosis. The paper also says macrophages try to degrade implanted material and are thought to coordinate the fibroblast response that forms a capsule. It does not describe macrophages coordinating granulation-tissue formation or identify granulation tissue as a precursor to the capsule. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lymphocytes also participate, but their role still remains poorly understood.

    “In addition, lymphocytes also participate, but their role still remains poorly understood.”

    From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [207]

    The Discussion says the role of dendritic cells in the foreign body response remains poorly understood, but does not make that statement about lymphocytes. The Methods list B cells, T cells and natural killer cells among cell types distinguishable by the RNA-seq analysis; they do not establish the claimed participation or characterize their role. Searches for lymphocytes and their role found no passage that settles the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. [2]B. S. Spearman, Tissue-engineered peripheral nerve interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1701713 (2018). PMC10569514 37829558
  2. [5]W. Kenneth Ward, A review of the foreign-body response to subcutaneously-implanted devices: The role of macrophages and cytokines in biofouling and fibrosis. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2, 768– 777 (2008). 19885259 PMC2769792
  3. [6]P. M. Henson, The immunologic release of constituents from neutrophil leukocytes. I. The role of antibody and complement on nonphagocytosable surfaces or phagocytosable particles. J. Immunol. 107, 1535– 1546 (1971). 5120396
  4. [7]J. S. Duffield, M. Lupher, V. J. Thannickal, T. A. Wynn, Host responses in tissue repair and fibrosis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 8, 241– 276 (2013). 23092186 PMC3789589
  5. [8]Z. Zhu, J. Ding, H. A. Shankowsky, E. E. Tredget, The molecular mechanism of hypertrophic scar. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 7, 239– 252 (2013). 23504443 PMC3889252
  6. [9]H. G. Mond, J. R. Helland, K. Stokes, G. A. Bornzin, R. McVenes, The electrode-tissue interface: The revolutionary role of steroid-elution. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 37, 1232– 1249 (2014). 25130977
  7. [10]P. Moshayedi, The relationship between glial cell mechanosensitivity and foreign body reactions in the central nervous system. Biomaterials 35, 3919– 3925 (2014). 24529901
  8. [11]A. Carnicer-Lombarte, Mechanical matching of implant to host minimises foreign body reaction. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2019). 10.1101/829648 (Accessed 10 March 2022). · DOI
  9. [12]J. J. FitzGerald, Suppression of scarring in peripheral nerve implants by drug elution. J. Neural Eng. 13, 026006 (2016). 26824180
  10. [13]U. Crisafulli, Topical dexamethasone administration impairs protein synthesis and neuronal regeneration in the olfactory epithelium. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11, 50 (2018). 29559887 PMC5845685
  11. [14]C. E. Bryant, International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVI. Pattern recognition receptors in health and disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 67, 462– 504 (2015). 25829385 PMC4394686
  12. [16]S. M. Man, Inflammasome activation causes dual recruitment of NLRC4 and NLRP3 to the same macromolecular complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 7403– 7408 (2014). 24803432 PMC4034195
  13. [17]S. Christo, A. Bachhuka, K. R. Diener, K. Vasilev, J. D. Hayball, The contribution of inflammasome components on macrophage response to surface nanotopography and chemistry. Sci. Rep. 6, 26207 (2016). 27188492 PMC4870632
  14. [18]S. N. Christo, Inflammasome components ASC and AIM2 modulate the acute phase of biomaterial implant-induced foreign body responses. Sci. Rep. 6, 20635 (2016). 26860464 PMC4748295
  15. [19]S. Nadeau, Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury is dependent on the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF: Implications for neuropathic pain. J. Neurosci. 31, 12533– 12542 (2011). 21880915 PMC6703268
  16. [20]K. M. Musick, D. J. Chew, J. W. Fawcett, S. P. Lacour, “PDMS microchannel regenerative peripheral nerve interface” in 2013 Sixth International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) (IEEE, 2013), pp. 649– 652.
  17. [21]D. J. Chew, A microchannel neuroprosthesis for bladder control after spinal cord injury in rat. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 210ra155 (2013). 24197736
  18. [22]K. M. Musick, Chronic multichannel neural recordings from soft regenerative microchannel electrodes during gait. Sci. Rep. 5, 14363 (2015). 26400791 PMC4585830
  19. [23]J. J. FitzGerald, A regenerative microchannel neural interface for recording from and stimulating peripheral axons in vivo. J. Neural Eng. 9, 016010 (2012). 22258138
  20. [24]J. Scheib, A. Höke, Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 668– 676 (2013). 24217518
  21. [25]S. N. Christo, K. R. Diener, A. Bachhuka, K. Vasilev, J. D. Hayball, Innate immunity and biomaterials at the nexus: Friends or foes. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 342304 (2015). 26247017 PMC4515263
  22. [26]L. Chung, D. R. Maestas Jr., F. Housseau, J. H. Elisseeff, Key players in the immune response to biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 114, 184– 192 (2017). 28712923
  23. [27]M. D. Wood, S. W. Kemp, C. Weber, G. H. Borschel, T. Gordon, Outcome measures of peripheral nerve regeneration. Ann. Anat. 193, 321– 333 (2011). 21640570
  24. [28]T. Gong, J. D. Szustakowski, DeconRNASeq: A statistical framework for deconvolution of heterogeneous tissue samples based on mRNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 29, 1083– 1085 (2013). 23428642
  25. [29]T. A. Wynn, A. Chawla, J. W. Pollard, Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature 496, 445– 455 (2013). 23619691 PMC3725458
  26. [30]B. Hinz, The myofibroblast: One function, multiple origins. Am. J. Pathol. 170, 1807– 1816 (2007). 17525249 PMC1899462
  27. [32]D. Chauhan, L. Vande Walle, M. Lamkanfi, Therapeutic modulation of inflammasome pathways. Immunol. Rev. 297, 123– 138 (2020). 32770571 PMC7497261
  28. [35]E. Dondossola, Examination of the foreign body response to biomaterials by nonlinear intravital microscopy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0007 (2016). 28979821 PMC5624536
  29. [37]S. Vasilijić, Dendritic cells acquire tolerogenic properties at the site of sterile granulomatous inflammation. Cell. Immunol. 233, 148– 157 (2005). 15978562
  30. [38]B. G. Keselowsky, J. S. Lewis, Dendritic cells in the host response to implanted materials. Semin. Immunol. 29, 33– 40 (2017). 28487131 PMC5612375
  31. [40]M. A. Ataide, Malaria-induced NLRP12/NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation mediates inflammation and hypersensitivity to bacterial superinfection. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1003885 (2014). 24453977 PMC3894209
  32. [41]S. M. Man, Salmonella infection induces recruitment of caspase-8 to the inflammasome to modulate IL-1β production. J. Immunol. 191, 5239– 5246 (2013). 24123685 PMC3835177
  33. [42]O. K. Favor, J. J. Pestka, M. A. Bates, K. S. S. Lee, Centrality of myeloid-lineage phagocytes in particle-triggered inflammation and autoimmunity. Front. Toxicol. 3, 777768 (2021). 35295146 PMC8915915
  34. [43]F. Lotti, F. Ranieri, G. Vadalà, L. Zollo, G. Di Pino, Invasive intraneural interfaces: Foreign body reaction issues. Front. Neurosci. 11, 497 (2017). 28932181 PMC5592213
  35. [45]S. M. van Putten, M. Wübben, W. E. Hennink, M. J. van Luyn, M. C. Harmsen, The downmodulation of the foreign body reaction by cytomegalovirus encoded interleukin-10. Biomaterials 30, 730– 735 (2009). 19038442
  36. [46]D. N. Heo, Multifunctional hydrogel coatings on the surface of neural cuff electrode for improving electrode-nerve tissue interfaces. Acta Biomater. 39, 25– 33 (2016). 27163406
  37. [47]A. R. Bauder, T. A. Ferguson, Reproducible mouse sciatic nerve crush and subsequent assessment of regeneration by whole mount muscle analysis. J. Vis. Exp. (60), 3606 (2012). 22395197 PMC3376939
  38. [48]A. Dobin, STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15– 21 (2013). 23104886 PMC3530905
  39. [49]P. Ewels, F. Krueger, M. Käller, S. Andrews, Cluster Flow: A user-friendly bioinformatics workflow tool. F1000 Res. 5, 2824 (2016). PMC5310375 28299179
  40. [50]P. Ewels, M. Magnusson, S. Lundin, M. Käller, MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 32, 3047– 3048 (2016). 27312411 PMC5039924
  41. [51]S. Anders, P. T. Pyl, W. Huber, HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166– 169 (2015). 25260700 PMC4287950
  42. [52]Y. Liao, G. K. Smyth, W. Shi, featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923– 930 (2014). 24227677
  43. [53]F. García-Alcalde, Qualimap: Evaluating next-generation sequencing alignment data. Bioinformatics 28, 2678– 2679 (2012). 22914218
  44. [54]M. I. Love, W. Huber, S. Anders, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014). 25516281 PMC4302049
  45. [55]J. R. Conway, A. Lex, N. Gehlenborg, UpSetR: An R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33, 2938– 2940 (2017). 28645171 PMC5870712
  46. [56]Z. Y. Chen, Inference of immune cell composition on the expression profiles of mouse tissue. Sci. Rep. 7, 40508 (2017). 28084418 PMC5233994
  47. [58]G. Gambarotta, Identification and validation of suitable housekeeping genes for normalizing quantitative real-time PCR assays in injured peripheral nerves. PLoS One 9, e105601 (2014). 25144298 PMC4140797
  48. [59]E. Ydens, Nlrp6 promotes recovery after peripheral nerve injury independently of inflammasomes. J. Neuroinflammation 12, 143 (2015). 26253422 PMC4528710

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barone, D. G., Carnicer-Lombarte, A., Tourlomousis, P., Hamilton, R. S., Prater, M., Rutz, A. L., Dimov, I. B., Malliaras, G. G., Lacour, S. P., Robertson, A. A. B., Franze, K., Fawcett, J. W., & Bryant, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0PY, United Kingdom
  • Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronics Interface, Institute of Microengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Corresponding author
  • Fawcett, James W.
  • Bryant, Clare E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-03-17
Volume
119
Issue
12
Pages
e2115857119-e2115857119
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4221014594
Cited by
67
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 3
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Fondation Bertarelli
  • Wellcome Trust (Z/17/Z, 772426, 085686/Z/08/A, 108045/Z/15/Z, 208363/Z/17/Z, 108045, /Z/15/Z, 208363, 109511/Z/15/Z, 109511)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2019-14-004)
  • European Commission (772426, HORIZON2020, 797506)
  • University of Queensland (QLD 4072)
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (208363/Z/17/Z, MC_UU_00014/5, RG70550)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L015978/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N006402/1)
  • H2020 European Research Council (772426)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
foreign body reaction, NLRP3 inflammasome, inflammasome inhibition, macrophages, neuroprosthetics
MeSH terms
NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein, Foreign Bodies, Humans, Macrophages, Prostheses and Implants, Inflammasomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review