CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Economic and Environmental ValuationEnvironmental Science and Water ManagementSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the social benefits of water quality improvements to support regulatory objectives: Progress and future directions

Open access
Moore, Chris C., Corona, Joel, Griffiths, Charles, Heberling, Matthew T., Hewitt, Julie A., Keiser, David A., Kling, Catherine L., Massey, D. Matthew, Papenfus, Michael, Phaneuf, Daniel J., Smith, David J., Vossler, Christian A., Wheeler, William·2023·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2120247120PMC PMC10160971
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans the biological, physical, and social sciences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2120247120

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Examples of EPA-supported research that led to methodological advances in nonmarket valuation and improvements in regulatory impact analysis performed by EPA.
Fig. 1. Examples of EPA-supported research that led to methodological advances in nonmarket valuation and improvements in regulatory impact analysis performed by EPA.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. Graphical representations of water quality used on stated preference surveys (25–27).
Fig. 2. Graphical representations of water quality used on stated preference surveys (25–27).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. A. J. Lyke, Discrete Choice Models to Value Changes in Environmental Quality: A Great Lakes Case Study (The University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1993).
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “International Workshop on Benefits Transfer and Valuation Databases: Are We Heading in the Right Direction?” (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington DC 2005).
  3. R. T. Carson, The Stated Preference Approach to Environmental Valuation (Taylor & Francis Group, United Kingdom), vol. I–III.
  4. A. M. Freeman III, J. A. Herriges and C. L. Kling, The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods (Routledge, 2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moore, C. C., Corona, J., Griffiths, C., Heberling, M. T., Hewitt, J. A., Keiser, D. A., Kling, C. L., Massey, D. M., Papenfus, M., Phaneuf, D. J., Smith, D. J., Vossler, C. A., & Wheeler, W.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Moore, Chris C.
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2023-04-24
Volume
120
Issue
18
Pages
e2120247120-e2120247120
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.2120247120
PMC
PMC10160971
OpenAlex
W4366816417
Cited by
23
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental Science and Water Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Keywords
water quality, social benefits, water quality improvement, water quality regulation, regulatory objectives, ecosystem services
MeSH terms
Quality Improvement, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review