Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell-penetrating peptides enhance peptide vaccine accumulation and persistence in lymph nodes to drive immunogenicity

Backlund, Coralie M., Holden, Rebecca L., Moynihan, Kelly D., Garafola, Daniel, Farquhar, Charlotte, Mehta, Naveen K., Maiorino, Laura, Pham, Sydney, Iorgulescu, J. Bryan, Reardon, David A., Wu, Catherine J., Pentelute, Bradley L., Irvine, Darrell J.·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Peptide-based cancer vaccines are widely investigated in the clinic but exhibit modest immunogenicity. One approach that has been explored to enhance peptide vaccine potency is covalent conjugation of antigens with cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), linear cationic and amphiphilic peptide sequences designed to promote intracellular delivery of associated cargos. Antigen-CPPs have been reported to exhibit enhanced immunogenicity compared to free peptides, but their mechanisms of action in vivo are poorly understood. We tested eight previously described CPPs conjugated to antigens from multiple syngeneic murine tumor models and found that linkage to CPPs enhanced peptide vaccine potency in vivo by as much as 25-fold. Linkage of antigens to CPPs did not impact dendritic cell activation but did promote uptake of linked antigens by dendritic cells both in vitro and in vivo. However, T cell priming in vivo required Batf3 -dependent dendritic cells, suggesting that antigens delivered by CPP peptides were predominantly presented via the process of cross-presentation and not through CPP-mediated cytosolic delivery of peptide to the classical MHC class I antigen processing pathway. Unexpectedly, we observed that many CPPs significantly enhanced antigen accumulation in draining lymph nodes. This effect was associated with the ability of CPPs to bind to lymph-trafficking lipoproteins and protection of CPP-antigens from proteolytic degradation in serum. These two effects resulted in prolonged presentation of CPP-peptides in draining lymph nodes, leading to robust T cell priming and expansion. Thus, CPPs can act through multiple unappreciated mechanisms to enhance T cell priming that can be exploited for cancer vaccines with enhanced potency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2204078119

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1038/s41541-019-0103-y · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.aar7112 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2999-3_5 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0227-0_5 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41598-019-56943-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1172/JCI80009 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41586-018-0792-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3892/or.2013.2556 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00262-015-1781-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1186/1479-5876-11-88 · DOI
  11. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501657 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41587-019-0322-9 · DOI
  13. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00610 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/14760584.2018.1506332 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nm.4200 · DOI
  16. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00884 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad8307 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature12978 · DOI
  20. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0607 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41551-020-0563-4 · DOI
  22. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01643 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210375 · DOI
  24. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000808 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/psc.968 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41557-021-00766-3 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)34080-2 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/cancers13102504 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.03.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/nn4057269 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.10.004 · DOI
  32. 10.1172/jci.insight.127305 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/mt.2016.134 · DOI
  34. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3017 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/icb.2011.13 · DOI
  36. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00245 · DOI
  37. 10.3390/molecules200814033 · DOI
  38. 10.3390/molecules23092233 · DOI
  39. 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4113 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.083 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s12026-016-8799-5 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02304.x · DOI
  43. 10.1111/exd.12285 · DOI
  44. 10.2174/1567201816666190123120915 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.07.006 · DOI
  46. 10.1042/BJ20050401 · DOI
  47. 10.1006/excr.2001.5316 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00216-9 · DOI
  49. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1724 · DOI
  50. Y. Kawakami , Recognition of multiple epitopes in the human melanoma antigen gp100 by tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes associated with in vivo tumor regression. J. Immunol. 154, 3961–3968 (1995). · DOI
  51. 10.1084/jem.20030590 · DOI
  52. 10.3390/vaccines8030453 · DOI
  53. 10.3390/vaccines9080917 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature14426 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/s41590-020-00810-3 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1095435 · DOI
  57. 10.4155/tde-2019-0042 · DOI
  58. N. A. Brooks, D. S. Pouniotis, C.-K. Tang, V. Apostolopoulos, G. A. Pietersz, Cell-penetrating peptides: Application in vaccine delivery. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1805, 25–34 (2010).
  59. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00112 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.12.015 · DOI
  61. 10.3389/fchem.2014.00062 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991029)83:3<326::AID-IJC7>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s00262-012-1382-6 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.coi.2017.07.003 · DOI
  65. 10.1126/science.aat5030 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/s41467-017-02191-y · DOI
  67. 10.1038/s41598-020-65100-2 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s12274-019-2301-3 · DOI
  69. 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd8003 · DOI
  70. 10.1186/s40425-019-0796-5 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/s41586-021-04232-5 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/nchembio.2318 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/s41467-020-16920-3 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Backlund, C. M., Holden, R. L., Moynihan, K. D., Garafola, D., Farquhar, C., Mehta, N. K., Maiorino, L., Pham, S., Iorgulescu, J. B., Reardon, D. A., Wu, C. J., Pentelute, B. L., & Irvine, D. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-08
Volume
119
Issue
32
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
61
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review