Cited by 2,936Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma

Open access
Ott, Patrick A., Hu, Zhuting, Keskin, Derin B., Shukla, Sachet A., Sun, Jing, Bozym, David J., Zhang, Wandi, Luoma, Adrienne +32 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Effective anti-tumour immunity in humans has been associated with the presence of T cells directed at cancer neoantigens, a class of HLA-bound peptides that arise from tumour-specific mutations. They are highly immunogenic because they are not present in normal tissues and hence bypass central thymic tolerance. Although neoantigens were long-envisioned as optimal targets for an anti-tumour immune response, their systematic discovery and evaluation only became feasible with the recent availability of massively parallel sequencing for detection of all coding mutations within tumours, and of machine learning approaches to reliably predict those mutated peptides with high-affinity binding of autologous human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. We hypothesized that vaccination with neoantigens can both expand pre-existing neoantigen-specific T-cell populations and induce a broader repertoire of new T-cell specificities in cancer patients, tipping the intra-tumoural balance in favour of enhanced tumour control. Here we demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and immunogenicity of a vaccine that targets up to 20 predicted personal tumour neoantigens. Vaccine-induced polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells targeted 58 (60%) and 15 (16%) of the 97 unique neoantigens used across patients, respectively. These T cells discriminated mutated from wild-type antigens, and in some cases directly recognized autologous tumour. Of six vaccinated patients, four had no recurrence at 25 months after vaccination, while two with recurrent disease were subsequently treated with anti-PD-1 (anti-programmed cell death-1) therapy and experienced complete tumour regression, with expansion of the repertoire of neoantigen-specific T cells. These data provide a strong rationale for further development of this approach, alone and in combination with checkpoint blockade or other immunotherapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature22991

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mRNA-based cancer vaccines are typically given alone or with immune checkpoint inhibitors after resection, though they have also been used in neoadjuvant-adjuvant approaches.

    “Cancer mRNA-based vaccines tend to be administered alone or in combination with ICIs, and after resection, although they have also been used in neoadjuvant–adjuvant treatment approaches136,138,139 (Fig. 3c,d).”

    From Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies in hepatocellular carcinoma (2024) · cites this paper as [138]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes vaccination after surgical resection and reports that two patients later received anti-PD-1 therapy. But this was a long-peptide vaccine, not an mRNA vaccine; the paper does not establish typical practice for mRNA vaccines or describe a neoadjuvant–adjuvant approach. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • HLA class I and class II molecules are centrally involved in CD8+ and CD4+ T cell immunity.

    “As both classes of HLA molecule have previously been shown to have a central role in CD8+ and CD4+ T cell immunity43–49”
  • Personalized neoantigen vaccines have been shown to modulate T cells in the tumor microenvironment and enhance responses to immune checkpoint therapy in both cold glioblastoma and hot melanoma.

    “which have been shown to modulate T cells in the TME and enhance responses to ICT, including in both immunologically”

    From The Next Decade of Immune Checkpoint Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [135]

  • Vaccination approaches have produced encouraging preclinical and clinical results and can increase intratumoral T cell infiltration and anti-tumor immune responses.

    “Vaccines have been used as an approach to enhance anti-tumor immune responses and have demonstrated encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies, leading to an expansion of the intratumoral T cell infiltration and anti-tumor immune responses (Carreno et al., 2015; Ott et al., 2017).”

    From Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade (2021) · cites this paper as Ott et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ott, P. A., Hu, Z., Keskin, D. B., Shukla, S. A., Sun, J., Bozym, D. J., Zhang, W., Luoma, A., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Peter, L., Chen, C., Olive, O., Carter, T. A., Li, S., Lieb, D. J., Eisenhaure, T., Gjini, E., Stevens, J., Lane, W. J., Javeri, I., Nellaiappan, K., Salazar, A. M., Daley, H., Seaman, M., Buchbinder, E. I., Yoon, C. H., Harden, M., Lennon, N., Gabriel, S., Rodig, S. J., Barouch, D. H., Aster, J. C., Getz, G., Wucherpfennig, K., Neuberg, D., Ritz, J., Lander, E. S., Fritsch, E. F., Hacohen, N., & Wu, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • CuriRx (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Catherine J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-07-05
Volume
547
Issue
7662
Pages
217-221
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2728365508
Cited by
2,936
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 277 · 2025: 299 · 2024: 307 · 2023: 312 · 2022: 316 · 2021: 381 · 2020: 369 · 2019: 309 · 2018: 283 · 2017: 79 · 2015: 1
FWCI
130.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-03-15)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL103532)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA207021, P50CA101942, R50CA211482, R01CA155010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
melanoma, personalized neoantigen vaccine, multipeptide vaccine, neoantigens, HLA-bound peptides, T cell response, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor regression, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer immunotherapy, tumor mutational burden
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Antigens, Neoplasm, Humans, Melanoma, Mutation, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cancer Vaccines, Precision Medicine, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review