The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke
Open accessAbstract
Functional recovery after stroke has been associated with brain plasticity; however, the exact relationship is unknown. We performed behavioral tests, functional MRI, and histology in a rat stroke model to assess the correlation between temporal changes in sensorimotor function, brain activation patterns, cerebral ischemic damage, and cerebrovascular reactivity. Unilateral stroke induced a large ipsilateral infarct and acute dysfunction of the contralateral forelimb, which significantly recovered at later stages. Forelimb impairment was accompanied by loss of stimulus-induced activation in the ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex; however, local tissue and perfusion were only moderately affected and cerebrovascular reactivity was preserved in this area. At 3 days after stroke, extensive activation-induced responses were detected in the contralesional hemisphere. After 14 days, we found reduced involvement of the contralesional hemisphere, and significant responses in the infarction periphery. Our data suggest that limb dysfunction is related to loss of brain activation in the ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex and that restoration of function is associated with biphasic recruitment of peri- and contralesional functional fields in the brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thresholds in cerebral ischemia - the ischemic penumbra.
Astrup, J., Siesjö, B. K., & Symon, L. (1981) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.12.6.723 · Cited by 2,820
Cited by
Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour
Murphy, T. H., & Corbett, D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2735 · Cited by 1,938
Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery
Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21393 · Cited by 875
Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Lindeman, E. (2004) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2004-00282 · Cited by 727
Getting Neurorehabilitation Right: What Can Be Learned From Animal Models?
Krakauer, J. W., Carmichael, S. T., Corbett, D., & Wittenberg, G. F. (2012) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968312440745 · Cited by 591
Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function
Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70264-3 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Dijkhuizen, R. M., Ren, J., Mandeville, J. B., Wu, O., Ozdag, F. M., Moskowitz, M. A., Rosen, B. R., & Finklestein, S. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-10-16
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12766-12771
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2063430655
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.231235598
- The paper
- Dijkhuizen, R. M., Ren, J., Mandeville, J. B., Wu, O., Ozdag, F. M., Moskowitz, M. A., Rosen, B. R., & Finklestein, S. P. (2001). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231235598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.