The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nature-based solutions for urban sustainability
Open accessAbstract
Nature-based Solutions for Urban SustainabilityCities across the globe face growing sustainability and resilience challenges that will require innovative solutions and collaborative partnerships.The pace of climate change, the frequency and duration of unprecedented climate-related events, threats to biodiversity, and the concentration of people and outdated infrastructure in cities demand new strategies to ensure that cities are livable, resilient, and equitable.Nature-based solutions (NbS) are at the forefront of addressing impacts of climate change, especially in urban planning, practice, and research.A growing number of cities worldwide are exploring NbS, sometimes referred to as green infrastructure, urban nature, ecosystem-based adaptations, or simply environmental restoration or conservation ( 1 ).NbS incorporate natural processes to support adaptation to climate change and urbanization, as well as the restoration of ecological functions ( Fig. 1 ).While emphasized as a tool to address climate change in cities, NbS are also promoted for their benefits to individuals and communities, including improved public health, access to nature, and social equity ( 2 , 3 ).In contrast to traditional engineered urban infrastructure that is mostly rigid and inflexible over time, NbS provide flexibility to confront the shifting impacts of climate change and uncertainty of the future ( 4 , 5 ).In keeping pace with accelerating interest in urban NbS worldwide, key principles, frameworks, and classification schemes are emerging to understand and advance NbS ( 6 -11 ).Not only has there been an explosion of research on NbS in the last 10 years, there have also been new local, national, and international development directives supporting NbS implementation.For example, NbS have gained strong support in local climate adaptation plans ( 12 ) and national policy agendas within the United States, where the Biden Administration Executive Order 14072 ( 13 ) centered NbS for climate adaptation and mitigation alongside biodiversity protection.NbS are also emerging in international agendas through the European Union Horizon 2020 ( 14), International Union of Conservation of Nature ( 15 ), United Nations (UN) ( 16 ), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( 17 ), and the World Economic Forum ( 18 ).Despite rapid uptake in policy, uncertainties remain about scaling up and scaling out of NbS to address climate change in cities, particularly in diverse social-cultural, governance, ecological-biophysical, climatic, and infrastructural contexts ( 19 ).For example, while NbS are expected to be versatile, multifunctional, and help mitigate the impact of climate risks, the full suite of NbS benefits and potential tradeoffs is uncertain, particularly under changing climate and more severe extreme weather-related events ( 4 , 20 -22 ).The recent frameworks on urban NbS have largely emerged from the Global North, and the application of these frameworks in other contexts, such as in the Global South, informal urban settlements, or from Indigenous perspectives, is not always appropriate ( 23 -26 ).Moreover, in some global regions, such as Latin America and the Caribbean, urban NbS are predominantly seen (and reported upon) in the wealthiest or largest nations and cities; NbS are less systematically studied elsewhere in the Latin America region, despite likely broad implementation through bottom-up or un-funded initiatives ( 27 , 28 ).Continued efforts studying place-based design, implementation, and functioning of NbS across diverse global contexts will provide an important solution-set for addressing future urban sustainability and resilience challenges.The objective of this paper is to introduce a Special Feature: "Nature-based Solutions for Urban Sustainability"-a collection of four articles addressing the current state of global urban NbS science and conceptual framings.The special feature explores opportunities for research and practice to scale up NbS to address equity, justice, and inclusion while enabling transformation in urbanized areas.The special feature includes a review and three perspectives papers that leverage learnings from NATURA (NAT ure-based Solutions for U rban R esilience in the A nthropocene), an international network of networks that connects academic researchers and practitioners around the world and provides a critical platform for knowledge exchange.The works in the special feature build upon the progress made through global collaborations on urban NbS within NATURA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The targeted nature-based defense strategy (S3) most favourably balances the trade-off, providing quantitative evidence for engineering-informed implementation of NbS.
“Our finding that a targeted nature-based defense strategy (Scenario S3) most favourably balances this tradeoff provides critical quantitative evidence for engineering-informed implementation of Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) 14 .”
From AI-driven digital twinning quantifies the trade-off between flood conveyance and riparian stability under climate extremes (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In “Framing NbS Science and Practice from a Global Network of Networks” (page unavailable), the paper calls for performance assessments and practical design guidance for nature-based solutions. It does not report Scenario S3, compare targeted defense strategies, or provide the quantitative finding described in the citing sentence; that finding is presented as the citing authors’ own. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecent extreme weather events have demonstrated that traditional static flood defence models are failing to predict the compound risks of vegetation growth and extreme precipitation.
“Recent extreme weather events, such as the 2024 floods in Central Europe and the 2025 cyclone-induced flooding in Southeast Asia, have demonstrated that traditional static flood defence models are failing to predict the compound risks of vegetation growth and extreme precipitation 13-15 .”
From AI-driven digital twinning quantifies the trade-off between flood conveyance and riparian stability under climate extremes (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In “Nature-based Solutions for Urban Sustainability” (page not provided), the paper describes traditional engineered urban infrastructure as rigid and inflexible in the face of changing climate impacts. It does not say that static flood-defence models failed to predict risks combining vegetation growth and extreme precipitation, or connect that failure to the cited floods and cyclone. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A social-ecological-technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services
McPhearson, T., Cook, E. M., Berbés-Blázquez, M., Cheng, C., Grimm, N. B., Andersson, E., Barbosa, O., Chandler, D. G., Chang, H., Chester, M. V., et al. (2022) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.007 · Cited by 373
Self-citationMarkolf, S. A., Chester, M. V., Eisenberg, D. A., Iwaniec, D. M., Davidson, C. I., Zimmerman, R., Miller, T. R., Ruddell, B. L., & Chang, H. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2018ef000926 · Cited by 312
Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions
McPhearson, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Ossola, A., Diep, L., Anderson, P. M. L., Blatch, T., Collier, M. J., Cook, E. M., Culwick Fatti, C., Grabowski, Z. J., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2315910121 · Cited by 47 · cited 3×
“The special feature articles include: a synthesis of global reviews on NbS ( 28 ), a perspective on principles for guiding transformative potential and equitable outcomes of NbS ( 34 ), a perspective on the radical, place - based levers needed to address power dynamics in adoption of NbS ( 35 ),…”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1038/541133b · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.013 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2019.0124 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101153 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106661 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42949-023-00134-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103283 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/fee.2445 · DOI · Paper page
- N. Bauduceau , Towards an EU Research and Innovation Policy Agenda for Nature-Based Solutions & Re-Naturing Cities: Final Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on “Nature Based Solutions and Re Naturing Cities” (Publications Office of the European Union, 2015).
- E. Cohen-Shacham C. J. Walters S. Maginnis Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges (2016). https://iucn.org/resources/publication/nature-based-solutions-address-global-societal-challenges. Accessed 30 January 2025. · DOI
- UNESCO, World Water Assessment Programme, The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018:: Nature-Based Solutions for Water (UNESCO, 2018).
- D. Dodman "Cities settlements and key infrastructure" in Climate Change 2022: Impacts Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press 2023) pp. 906–1040 10.1017/9781009325844.008. · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2019.0120 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/sus.2020.8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165824 · DOI
- N. B. Grimm Y. Kim J. R. Sauer S. R. Elser “Chapter 2: Nature-based solutions and climate change resilience“ in Nature-Based Solutions for Cities (Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham UK 2023) pp. 13–28. · DOI
- 10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10584-024-03682-w · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2315917121 · DOI
- S. Ozment Nature-Based Solutions in Latin America and The Caribbean: Regional Status and Priorities for Growth (2021). https://doi.org/10.18235/0003687. · DOI
- N. B. Grimm, E. M. Cook, R. L. Hale, D. M. Iwaniec, “A broader framing of ecosystem services in cities: Benefits and challenges of built, natural or hybrid system function” in The Routledge Handbook of Urbanization and Global Environmental Change, K. Seto, W. Solecki, C. Griffith, Eds. (Routledge, 2015), pp. 227–236.
- 10.1093/biosci/biw002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42949-023-00120-1 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2315911121 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2315912121 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shin, J. H., Go, S. H., & Park, J. H. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-63704-8
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, E. M., Kim, Y., Grimm, N. B., McPhearson, T., Anderson, P., Bulkeley, H., Collier, M. J., Diep, L., Morató, J., & Zhou, W.
- Affiliations
- Barnard College (US)
- Korea University (KR)
- Arizona State University (US)
- The New School (US)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Durham University (GB)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, Elizabeth M.
- Kim, Yeowon
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-07-14
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- e2315909122-e2315909122
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC12304908
- OpenAlex
- W4412400101
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- NSF (1927468, 1927167)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Keywords
- nature-based solutions, urban sustainability, climate change adaptation, green infrastructure, urban resilience, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, urban planning, social equity, urbanization, climate policy, ecological restoration, extreme weather events, biodiversity loss, social-ecological systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review