Cited by 65Environmental Justice and Health DisparitiesUrban Planning and Landscape DesignUrban Green Space and Health

“It won’t work here”: Lessons for just nature-based stream restoration in the context of urban informality

Open access
Diep, Loan, Parikh, Priti, Duarte, Barbara Pozzan dos Santos, Bourget, Anaïs Figueiredo, Dodman, David, Martins, José Rodolfo Scarati·2022·Environmental Science & Policy

Abstract

Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) have been advocated for their potential to contribute to the making of sustainable and just cities. However, a growing body of research shows that NBS cannot inherently provide just outcomes and might instead (re)produce environmental injustices. This research explores NBS for stream/river restoration in ‘informal’ areas, showing how riparian margins have become spaces of conflict. It draws lessons from two linear parks integrated into neighbourhood regeneration strategies in São Paulo. Data were collected from household surveys and focus group discussions to examine local populations’ values towards stream restoration. They provide understandings of residents’ perceptions towards multiple health and safety risks and concerns over contested responsibilities, notably revealing that local preferences for stream burial have been shaped by persisting waste dumping issues. An environmental justice lens helps highlight the limited integration of plural social and cultural values into project plans. This further helps draw lessons on ways to address local conflicts and integrate multiple socio-environmental values into NBS planning, with support from policy tools that allow stronger community engagement. Findings also support the identification of justice pathways for NBS in informal settings. The analysis of material and interpretative human-environment relationships provides evidence of opportunities for NBS to be integrated into everyday uses of local space and pre-existing environmental caring practices. For this, communities need to have stronger influence over decisions affecting them. The research thereby demonstrates that NBS will only become a mechanism for ecological recovery with city-wide benefits if marginalised groups are better included in their planning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.020

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of informal settlements, there is evidence of NbS providing important socioeconomic benefits to residents but also of having reproduced patterns of environmental injustices where participatory processes have been weak.

    “In the context of informal settlements, there is evidence of NbS providing important socioeconomic benefits to residents but also of having reproduced patterns of environmental injustices where participatory processes have been weak (112).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Botea, B., Rojon, S., 2015. Ethnographies du changement et de l ′ attachement: introduction. Parcour. Anthr. 10-22. https://doi.org/10.4000/pa.379. · DOI
  2. DeLanda, M, 2016. Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
  3. Mell, I.C., 2008. Integrated and sustainable planning: can Green Infrastructure meet the needs of a changing urban environment?, in: UK-Ireland Planning Research Conference 2008: Sustainability, Space and Social Justice. Queen's University, Belfast.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diep, L., Parikh, P., Duarte, B. P. D. S., Bourget, A. F., Dodman, D., & Martins, J. R. S.
Affiliations
  • The New School (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR)
  • International Institute for Environment and Development (GB)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Diep, Loan
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
136
Pages
542-554
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285982366
Cited by
65
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Academy of Engineering
  • University College London
  • Universidade de São Paulo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
nature-based solutions, stream restoration, river restoration, environmental justice, urban informality, informal settlements, linear park, neighborhood revitalization, community participation, waste dumping, socio-environmental values, São Paulo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review