Cited by 9Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsDNA Repair MechanismsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An integrated structural model of the DNA damage-responsive H3K4me3 binding WDR76:SPIN1 complex with the nucleosome

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Serial capture affinity purification (SCAP) is a powerful method to isolate a specific protein complex. When combined with cross-linking mass spectrometry and computational approaches, one can build an integrated structural model of the isolated complex. Here, we applied SCAP to dissect a subpopulation of WDR76 in complex with SPIN1, a histone reader that recognizes trimethylated histone H3 lysine4 (H3K4me3). In contrast to a previous SCAP analysis of the SPIN1:SPINDOC complex, histones and the H3K4me3 mark were enriched with the WDR76:SPIN1 complex. Next, interaction network analysis of copurifying proteins and microscopy analysis revealed a potential role of the WDR76:SPIN1 complex in the DNA damage response. Since we detected 149 pairs of cross-links between WDR76, SPIN1, and histones, we then built an integrated structural model of the complex where SPIN1 recognized the H3K4me3 epigenetic mark while interacting with WDR76. Finally, we used the powerful Bayesian Integrative Modeling approach as implemented in the Integrative Modeling Platform to build a model of WDR76 and SPIN1 bound to the nucleosome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2318601121

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1074/mcp.M111.011544 · DOI
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155492 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00373 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s12275-012-1597-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ncb2549 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/ncomms7533 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005790 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017080 · DOI
  9. J. W. Jones, P. Singh, C. K. Govind, Recruitment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cmr1/Ydl156w to coding regions promotes transcription genome wide. PLoS One 11, e0148897 (2016). · DOI
  10. 10.7150/thno.19988 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ncb1490 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nsmb.3076 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/s41467-018-08230-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s12964-019-0403-x · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41598-019-56211-6 · DOI
  16. 10.17305/bjbms.2020.5506 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s12672-023-00656-9 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174938 · DOI
  19. 10.7717/peerj.12277 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.012 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M604029200 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1208517109 · DOI
  23. 10.1101/gad.233239.113 · DOI
  24. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0440 · DOI
  25. 10.18632/oncotarget.3000 · DOI
  26. 10.18632/oncotarget.25977 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/35065132 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1074/jbc.M110.191411 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M117.814913 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.02.096 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.2007931117 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/pro.4387 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.016 · DOI
  35. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001244 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9608-7_15 · DOI
  37. 10.4161/nucl.1.1.10515 · DOI
  38. G. V. Los, K. Wood, The HaloTag: A novel technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 356, 195–208 (2007).
  39. 10.1038/nbt765 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/cyto.a.22321 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nmeth822 · DOI
  42. 10.1021/ac010617e · DOI
  43. M. Graham C. Combe L. Kolbowski J. Rappsilber xiView: A common platform for the downstream analysis of crosslinking mass spectrometry data. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/561829 (Accessed 26 February 2019). · DOI
  44. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1038/nmeth.3213 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv333 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.032 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/nprot.2010.32 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1038/nrm.2017.48 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.167994 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nature06404 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/pro.3995 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s41467-021-26588-y · DOI
  55. 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1007/978-1-59745-493-3_1 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.028 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nprot.2010.5 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.005 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.bpc.2016.11.013 · DOI
  62. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac400 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  64. X. Liu Halo-Control/WDR76/SPIN1/CBX5_purification_MudPIT_wPTMs. MassIVE. https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5S50C. Deposited 11 February 2021. · DOI
  65. X. Liu WDR76-SPIN1_inWDR76KO_SCAP-MS_MudPIT. MassIVE. https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5B79F. Deposited 3 February 2021. · DOI
  66. X. Liu Halo-WDR76_Purification_WDR76KObackground_MudPIT_wPTMs. MassIVE. https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5CZ1Z. Deposited 11 February 2021. · DOI
  67. X. Liu WDR76-SPIN1_SCAP-E2-XL_mzTab and mgf. MassIVE. https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C55V3T. Deposited 22 January 2021. · DOI
  68. X. Liu Halo-WDR76_Purification_inWDR76KO_DSSO-XL-MS. MassIVE. https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C53J67. Deposited 9 February 2021. · DOI
  69. X. Liu WDR76_SPIN1_Halo-AP_Enriched_Histones_AscendDIA. MassIVE. https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5M32NN1R. Deposited 15 April 2024. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Wen, Z., Hao, Y., Banks, C. A. S., Cesare, J., Bhattacharya, S., Arvindekar, S., Lange, J. J., Xie, Y., Garcia, B. A., Slaughter, B. D., Unruh, J. R., Viswanath, S., Florens, L., Workman, J. L., & Washburn, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Washburn, Michael P.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-08-08
Volume
121
Issue
33
Pages
e2318601121-e2318601121
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4401417600
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118068, R35GM145240)
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research (None Available)
  • Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (DAE TIFR RTI 4006)
  • Science Engineering and Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (SPG/2020/000475)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
SPIN1, H3K4me3, histone reader, DNA damage response, nucleosome, protein complex structure, cross-linking mass spectrometry, histone methylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review