The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial sensor evolved by decreasing complexity
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Bacterial receptors feed into multiple signal transduction pathways that regulate a variety of cellular processes including gene expression, second messenger levels, and motility. Receptors are typically activated by signal binding to ligand-binding domains (LBDs). Cache domains are omnipresent LBDs found in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, including humans. They form the predominant family of extracytosolic bacterial LBDs and were identified in all major receptor types. Cache domains are composed of either a single (sCache) or a double (dCache) structural module. The functional relevance of bimodular LBDs remains poorly understood. Here, we identify the PacF chemoreceptor in the phytopathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum that recognizes formate at the membrane-distal module of its dCache domain, triggering chemoattraction. We further demonstrate that a family of formate-specific sCache domains has evolved from a dCache domain, exemplified by PacF, by losing the membrane-proximal module. By solving high-resolution structures of two family members in complex with formate, we show that the molecular basis for formate binding at sCache and dCache domains is highly similar, despite their low sequence identity. The apparent loss of the membrane-proximal module may be related to the observation that dCache domains bind ligands typically at the membrane-distal module, whereas studies have failed to find ligands bound in the membrane-proximal module. This work advances our understanding of signal sensing in bacterial receptors and suggests that evolution by reducing complexity may be a route for shaping diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 80
- 10.1016/j.tim.2004.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1128/MMBR.00033-17 · DOI
- 10.1093/femsre/fuab043 · DOI
- 10.1126/scisignal.abc8521 · DOI
- 10.1128/msystems.01518-21 · DOI
- 10.1111/1462-2920.14398 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkad847 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2110415119 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2305837120 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00032-X · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-121809-151631 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004862 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01672-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.adi4517 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac993 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1201400109 · DOI
- 10.1128/mbio.03458-21 · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.01894-18 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI-10-19-0277-R · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.02.090 · DOI
- 10.1042/BCJ20180769 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00779-18 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep20866 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.008 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2201747119 · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.01819-21 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-50275-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/msystems.00951-21 · DOI
- J. P. Cerna-Vargas , Chemoperception of specific amino acids controls phytopathogenicity in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. 10, e0186819 (2019).
- 10.1111/mpp.13238 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00398-07 · DOI
- 10.1094/PHYTO-10-22-0367-R · DOI
- 10.1111/1751-7915.14306 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00149.x · DOI
- 10.1111/mmi.15069 · DOI
- 10.1111/1751-7915.14255 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms21228459 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0169536 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00294-016-0646-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/mmi.12929 · DOI
- 10.1111/mmi.14370 · DOI
- 10.3390/biology10121345 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.4229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1066803 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0402424101 · DOI
- 10.1099/ijs.0.64122-0 · DOI
- 10.1099/ijs.0.000368 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.01677-12 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002030050416 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.03066-19 · DOI
- Taha , Diverse sensory repertoire of paralogous chemoreceptors Tlp2, Tlp3, and Tlp4 in Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e0364622 (2022). · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00421-13 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms13206 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1904234116 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.26510 · DOI
- 10.1002/bies.201300037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102358 · DOI
- 10.1128/mbio.03564-22 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00519-18 · DOI
- 10.1111/mmi.12255 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-7577-8_23 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msy096 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444994003112 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909042589 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910026582 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444911001314 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0021889805038987 · DOI
- 10.1107/S2052252514009324 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Monteagudo-Cascales, E., Gavira, J. A., Xing, J., Velando, F., Matilla, M. A., Zhulin, I. B., & Krell, T.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gavira, José A.
- Xing, Jiawei
- Zhulin, Igor B.
- Krell, Tino
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-01-29
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e2409881122-e2409881122
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC11804620
- OpenAlex
- W4406950091
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020-112612 GB-I00, PID2019-103972GA-I00, PID2020-116261 GB-I00, PID2023-146216NB-I00, PID2023-146281NB-I00)
- Consejería de Conocimiento, Investigación y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía (P18-FR-1621)
- HHS | NIH (R35GM131760)
- MEC | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (2024AEP062)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- ligand-binding domain, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, chemotaxis, domain evolution, bacterial chemoreceptors, ligand binding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review