The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: Aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos
Open accessAbstract
Mouse embryos undergo genome-wide methylation reprogramming by demethylation in early preimplantation development, followed by remethylation thereafter. Here we show that genome-wide reprogramming is conserved in several mammalian species and ask whether it also occurs in embryos cloned with the use of highly methylated somatic donor nuclei. Normal bovine, rat, and pig zygotes showed a demethylated paternal genome, suggesting active demethylation. In bovine embryos methylation was further reduced during cleavage up to the eight-cell stage, and this reduction in methylation was followed by de novo methylation by the 16-cell stage. In cloned one-cell embryos there was a reduction in methylation consistent with active demethylation, but no further demethylation occurred subsequently. Instead, de novo methylation and nuclear reorganization of methylation patterns resembling those of differentiated cells occurred precociously in many cloned embryos. Cloned, but not normal, morulae had highly methylated nuclei in all blastomeres that resembled those of the fibroblast donor cells. Our study shows that epigenetic reprogramming occurs aberrantly in most cloned embryos; incomplete reprogramming may contribute to the low efficiency of cloning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A., & Li, E. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81656-6 · Cited by 6,143
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Reik, W., Dean, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063443 · Cited by 3,078
Self-citation
Cited by
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
DNA methylation and human disease
Robertson, K. D. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1655 · Cited by 2,864
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development
Reik, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05918 · Cited by 1,963
Self-citationChromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development
Li, E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg887 · Cited by 1,900
Lane, N., Dean, W., Erhardt, S., Hajkova, P., Surani, A., Walter, J., & Reik, W. (2003) · genesis · doi:10.1002/gene.10168 · Cited by 667
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, W., Santos, F., Stojkovic, M., Zakhartchenko, V., Walter, J., Wolf, E., & Reik, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-11-20
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13734-13738
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2071953998
- Cited by
- 972
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: Aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.241522698
- The paper
- Dean, W., Santos, F., Stojkovic, M., Zakhartchenko, V., Walter, J., Wolf, E., & Reik, W. (2001). Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: Aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241522698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.