Cited by 3,984Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality

Abstract

Gene targeting in embryonic stem (ES) cells has been used to mutate the murine DNA methyltransferase gene. ES cell lines homozygous for the mutation were generated by consecutive targeting of both wild-type alleles; the mutant cells were viable and showed no obvious abnormalities with respect to growth rate or morphology, and had only trace levels of DNA methyltransferase activity. A quantitative end-labeling assay showed that the level of m5C in the DNA of homozygous mutant cells was about one-third that of wild-type cells, and Southern blot analysis after cleavage of the DNA with a methylation-sensitive restriction endonuclease revealed substantial demethylation of endogenous retroviral DNA. The mutation was introduced into the germline of mice and found to cause a recessive lethal phenotype. Homozygous embryos were stunted, delayed in development, and did not survive past mid-gestation. The DNA of homozygous embryos showed a reduction of the level of m5C similar to that of homozygous ES cells. These results indicate that while a 3-fold reduction in levels of genomic m5C has no detectable effect on the viability or proliferation of ES cells in culture, a similar reduction of DNA methylation in embryos causes abnormal development and embryonic lethality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,984

Metadata

Authors
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R.
Affiliations
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-06
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
915-926
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046241907
Cited by
3,984
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 147 · 2015: 157 · 2014: 169 · 2013: 178 · 2012: 187
FWCI
28.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r35ca044339-13, 5r01gm043565-04)
  • National Cancer Institute (R35 CA 44339-05)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-43565)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
DNA methyltransferases, embryonic lethality, DNA methylation, 5-methylcytosine, demethylation, embryonic stem cells, germline mutations, recessive lethality, mouse embryo development, gene targeting
MeSH terms
Animals, Chimera, DNA, DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases, Genes, Lethal, Homozygote, Methylation, Stem Cells, Blotting, Western, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review