Cited by 36Climate change impacts on agricultureAgricultural Economics and PracticesAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Prospects for cereal self-sufficiency in sub-Saharan Africa

Open access
van Ittersum, Martin K., Alimagham, Seyyedmajid, Silva, João Vasco, Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel, Baijukya, Frederick P., Bala, Abdullahi, Chikowo, Regis, Grassini, Patricio +9 more·2025·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the world’s largest projected increase in demand for food. Increased dependence on imports makes SSA vulnerable to geopolitical and economic risks, while further expansion of agricultural land is environmentally harmful. Cereals, in particular, maize, millet, rice, sorghum, and wheat, take nearly 50% of the cropland and 43% of the calories and proteins consumed in the region. Demand is projected to double until 2050. Here, we assess recent developments in cereal self-sufficiency and provide outlooks until 2050 under different intensification, area expansion, and climate change scenarios. We use detailed data for ten countries. Cereal self-sufficiency increased between 2010 and 2020 from 84 to 92% despite the 29% population increase. The production increase was achieved by increased yields per hectare (44%), area expansion (34%), and a shift from millet to the higher yielding maize (22%). Outlooks for 2050 are less pessimistic than earlier assessments because of the larger 2020 baseline area, higher shares of maize and somewhat less steep projected population increase. Yet, to halt further area expansion, a drastic trend change in annual yield increase from the present 20 to 58 kg ha −1 y −1 is needed to achieve cereal self-sufficiency. While such yield increases have been achieved elsewhere and are feasible given the yield potentials in SSA, they require structural changes and substantial agronomic, socioeconomic, and political investments. We estimate that amounts of added nitrogen need to at least triple to achieve such yield improvements, but it is essential that this comes with improved context-specific agronomy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2423669122

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
van Ittersum, M. K., Alimagham, S., Silva, J. V., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Baijukya, F. P., Bala, A., Chikowo, R., Grassini, P., de Groot, H. L. E., Nshizirungu, A., Mahamane Soulé, A., Sulser, T. B., Taulya, G., Amor Tenorio, F., Tesfaye, K., Yuan, S., & van Loon, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (TZ)
  • University of Phoenix (US)
  • Crop Science Department, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe/International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Sustainable Agrifood Systems Program (SAS)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Earth Observation and Environmental Informatics, Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research
  • Département des Cultures Pluviales, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (KE)
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Alimagham, Seyyedmajid
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-06-09
Volume
122
Issue
24
Pages
e2423669122-e2423669122
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4411141556
Cited by
36
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 5
FWCI
33.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-030103, INV-005431)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (INV-018444)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
sub-Saharan Africa, food demand projections, maize, millet, crop yield improvement, agricultural expansion, nitrogen fertilization, climate change scenarios, food security, population growth, crop diversification
MeSH terms
Millets, Agriculture, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Food Supply, Humans, Africa South of the Sahara, Crops, Agricultural, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review