Cited by 6Vector-borne infectious diseasesInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ATF6 enables pathogen infection in ticks by inducing stomatin and altering cholesterol dynamics

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

How tick-borne pathogens interact with their hosts has been primarily studied in vertebrates where disease is observed. Comparatively less is known about pathogen interactions within the tick. Here, we report that Ixodes scapularis ticks infected with either Anaplasma phagocytophilum (causative agent of anaplasmosis) or Borrelia burgdorferi (causative agent of Lyme disease) show activation of the ATF6 branch of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Disabling ATF6 functionally restricts pathogen survival in ticks. When stimulated, ATF6 functions as a transcription factor, but is the least understood out of the three UPR pathways. To interrogate the Ixodes ATF6 transcriptional network, we developed a custom R script to query tick promoter sequences. This revealed stomatin as a potential gene target, which has roles in lipid homeostasis and vesical transport. Ixodes stomatin was experimentally validated as a bona fide ATF6-regulated gene through luciferase reporter assays, pharmacological activators, RNA interference transcriptional repression, and immunofluorescence microscopy. Silencing stomatin decreased A. phagocytophilum colonization in Ixodes and disrupted cholesterol dynamics in tick cells. Furthermore, blocking stomatin restricted cholesterol availability to the bacterium, thereby inhibiting growth and survival. Taken together, we have identified the Ixodes ATF6 pathway as a contributor to vector competence through Stomatin-regulated cholesterol homeostasis. Moreover, our custom, web-based transcription factor binding site search tool “ArthroQuest” revealed that the ATF6-regulated nature of stomatin is unique to blood-feeding arthropods. Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of studying fundamental processes in nonmodel organisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2501045122

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. ATF6 is induced by tick-borne pathogens during infection and supports vector colonization. (A) Schematic depicting ATF6 activation. (B) HEK 293T cells were transfected with an ATF6 luciferase reporter plasmid. Transfected cells were infected with A. phagocytophilum (MOI 50) or B. burgdorferi (MOI 200) for 18 h and normalized to no infection (−). RLU is relative luminescence units. (C and D) Gene expression of atf6 in I. scapularis larvae rested for 7 d after feeding on Anaplasma-infected mice (C) and rested for 14 d after feeding on Borrelia-infected mice (D). Expression was assessed via qRT-PCR. Each data point is representative of 1 larva. (−) is no infection. A.p. is A. phagocytophilum. B.b. is B. burgdorferi. (E) ATF6 (55 kDa) immunoblot against nuclear extracts of ISE6 tick cells that were either uninfected (−) or persistently infected with A. phagocytophilum (A.p.). Histone H3 was probed as a loading control (16 kDa). (F) RNAi knockdown of atf6 in ISE6 cells for 5 d and infected with A. phagocytophilum (MOI 50). scRNA, scrambled RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA. Experiments are representative of at least two experimental replicates. *P < 0.05.
Fig. 1. ATF6 is induced by tick-borne pathogens during infection and supports vector colonization. (A) Schematic depicting ATF6 activation. (B) HEK 293T cells were transfected with an ATF6 luciferase reporter plasmid. Transfected cells were infected with A. phagocytophilum (MOI 50) or B. burgdorferi (MOI 200) for 18 h and normalized to no infection (−). RLU is relative luminescence units. (C and D) Gene expression of atf6 in I. scapularis larvae rested for 7 d after feeding on Anaplasma-infected mice (C) and rested for 14 d after feeding on Borrelia-infected mice (D). Expression was assessed via qRT-PCR. Each data point is representative of 1 larva. (−) is no infection. A.p. is A. phagocytophilum. B.b. is B. burgdorferi. (E) ATF6 (55 kDa) immunoblot against nuclear extracts of ISE6 tick cells that were either uninfected (−) or persistently infected with A. phagocytophilum (A.p.). Histone H3 was probed as a loading control (16 kDa). (F) RNAi knockdown of atf6 in ISE6 cells for 5 d and infected with A. phagocytophilum (MOI 50). scRNA, scrambled RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA. Experiments are representative of at least two experimental replicates. *P < 0.05.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. Predicting the ATF6 regulatory network in ticks. (A) The I. scapularis ATF6 (orange) predicted with AlphaFold has a conserved DNA binding domain compared to the human ortholog (green). (B) A portion of the bZIP domain and the DNA binding residues on ATF6 are visualized. (C) Schematic of the developed R script. (D) Comparison of genes predicted to be regulated by ATF6 from I. scapularis, D. melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. (E) GO terms and Reactome pathways represented in predicted ATF6-regulated genes from the I. scapularis genome.
Fig. 2. Predicting the ATF6 regulatory network in ticks. (A) The I. scapularis ATF6 (orange) predicted with AlphaFold has a conserved DNA binding domain compared to the human ortholog (green). (B) A portion of the bZIP domain and the DNA binding residues on ATF6 are visualized. (C) Schematic of the developed R script. (D) Comparison of genes predicted to be regulated by ATF6 from I. scapularis, D. melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. (E) GO terms and Reactome pathways represented in predicted ATF6-regulated genes from the I. scapularis genome.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. ATF6 upregulates stomatin during infection in ticks which supports Anaplasma. (A) The AlphaFold3 predicted DNA–protein complex with I. scapularis nATF6 (tan) and the predicted promoter of stomatin (teal). The ATF6 binding site is highlighted in yellow and DNA binding residues highlighted in purple. (B and C) stomatin expression quantified from (B) ISE6 cells treated with 5 µM to 50 µM of AA147 for 24 h and (C) ISE6 cells transfected with siRNA targeting atf6 or a scrambled control. (D) HEK 293T cells were cotransfected with plasmids constitutively expressing I. scapularis nATF6, I. scapularis NF-Y, and a luciferase reporter plasmid with the stomatin promoter. Luciferase activity was normalized to the control containing only the luciferase reporter plasmid. RLU is relative luminescence units. (E and F) Gene expression of larvae rested for 7 d after being fed on Anaplasma-infected mice (E) or rested for 14 d after being fed on B. burgdorferi–infected mice (F). (G) stomatin gene expression from unfed, infected I. scapularis nymphs. A.p. is A. phagocytophilum. B.b. is B. burgdorferi. Expression assessed via qRT-PCR. (H) ISE6 cells were transfected with siRNA or a scrambled control. Cells were infected with A. phagocytophilum (MOI 50) for 18 h. (I) siRNA-treated or scrambled control-treated larvae were fed on A. phagocytophilum–infected mice. Each data point is representative of 1 larva. Open and closed dots represent experimental replicates 1 and 2. Gene silencing and bacterial burden were measured by qRT-PCR. scRNA, scrambled RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA; *P < 0.05.
Fig. 3. ATF6 upregulates stomatin during infection in ticks which supports Anaplasma. (A) The AlphaFold3 predicted DNA–protein complex with I. scapularis nATF6 (tan) and the predicted promoter of stomatin (teal). The ATF6 binding site is highlighted in yellow and DNA binding residues highlighted in purple. (B and C) stomatin expression quantified from (B) ISE6 cells treated with 5 µM to 50 µM of AA147 for 24 h and (C) ISE6 cells transfected with siRNA targeting atf6 or a scrambled control. (D) HEK 293T cells were cotransfected with plasmids constitutively expressing I. scapularis nATF6, I. scapularis NF-Y, and a luciferase reporter plasmid with the stomatin promoter. Luciferase activity was normalized to the control containing only the luciferase reporter plasmid. RLU is relative luminescence units. (E and F) Gene expression of larvae rested for 7 d after being fed on Anaplasma-infected mice (E) or rested for 14 d after being fed on B. burgdorferi–infected mice (F). (G) stomatin gene expression from unfed, infected I. scapularis nymphs. A.p. is A. phagocytophilum. B.b. is B. burgdorferi. Expression assessed via qRT-PCR. (H) ISE6 cells were transfected with siRNA or a scrambled control. Cells were infected with A. phagocytophilum (MOI 50) for 18 h. (I) siRNA-treated or scrambled control-treated larvae were fed on A. phagocytophilum–infected mice. Each data point is representative of 1 larva. Open and closed dots represent experimental replicates 1 and 2. Gene silencing and bacterial burden were measured by qRT-PCR. scRNA, scrambled RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA; *P < 0.05.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 4. Stomatin supports infection by facilitating A. phagocytophilum cholesterol uptake. (A) Total cholesterol quantified from A. phagocytophilum–infected ISE6 cells compared to uninfected cells (−). Each point represents an experimental replicate. (B) Cholesterol quantified from cells treated with silencing RNAs targeting stomatin or scrambled controls. Gene silencing was measured by qRT-PCR. (C) Representative images of ISE6 cells transfected with silencing RNAs targeting stomatin or a scrambled control. Cells were fixed and stained with filipin. Scale bar is 10 microns. (D) Relative fluorescence intensity of filipin staining between stomatin-silenced cells or scrambled controls. Each dot represents one analyzed image. (E) Representative images of A. phagocytophilum infected ISE6 cells transfected for 5 d with silencing RNAs targeting stomatin or a scrambled control. Cells were stained with filipin (blue) and an antibody targeting A. phagocytophilum VirD4 (red). White dotted lines outline morulae. Scale bar is 10 microns. (F) Relative fluorescence intensity of filipin staining in the morulae between stomatin-silenced cells or scrambled controls. Each dot represents one cell analyzed. (G) Morulae size measurements in stomatin-silenced cells or scrambled controls. Each dot represents one morula measured. (H) Cholesterol quantified from A. phagocytophilum grown in stomatin-depleted ISE6 tick cells. scRNA, scrambled RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA. scStomatin, scrambled controls. siStomatin, siRNA targeting stomatin. A.U., arbitrary units. Experiments are representative of at least two experimental replicates. *P < 0.05.
Fig. 4. Stomatin supports infection by facilitating A. phagocytophilum cholesterol uptake. (A) Total cholesterol quantified from A. phagocytophilum–infected ISE6 cells compared to uninfected cells (−). Each point represents an experimental replicate. (B) Cholesterol quantified from cells treated with silencing RNAs targeting stomatin or scrambled controls. Gene silencing was measured by qRT-PCR. (C) Representative images of ISE6 cells transfected with silencing RNAs targeting stomatin or a scrambled control. Cells were fixed and stained with filipin. Scale bar is 10 microns. (D) Relative fluorescence intensity of filipin staining between stomatin-silenced cells or scrambled controls. Each dot represents one analyzed image. (E) Representative images of A. phagocytophilum infected ISE6 cells transfected for 5 d with silencing RNAs targeting stomatin or a scrambled control. Cells were stained with filipin (blue) and an antibody targeting A. phagocytophilum VirD4 (red). White dotted lines outline morulae. Scale bar is 10 microns. (F) Relative fluorescence intensity of filipin staining in the morulae between stomatin-silenced cells or scrambled controls. Each dot represents one cell analyzed. (G) Morulae size measurements in stomatin-silenced cells or scrambled controls. Each dot represents one morula measured. (H) Cholesterol quantified from A. phagocytophilum grown in stomatin-depleted ISE6 tick cells. scRNA, scrambled RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA. scStomatin, scrambled controls. siStomatin, siRNA targeting stomatin. A.U., arbitrary units. Experiments are representative of at least two experimental replicates. *P < 0.05.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 5. ATF6 supports arthropod infection through Stomatin-regulated cholesterol delivery to the pathogen. (A) Infection activates ATF6 which translocates to the nucleus and upregulates stomatin expression. Stomatin regulates cholesterol distribution in the cell and to the Anaplasma containing vacuole for growth and survival in ticks. (B) ArthroQuest was used to identify organisms containing ATF6 binding sites in the promoter regions of Stomatin orthologs. Stomatin orthologs were identified using the Ixodes protein sequence. Green checkmarks indicate that the top ortholog contains an ATF6 binding site in the promoter region. Yellow checkmarks indicate that a significant ortholog hit contains an ATF6 binding site in the promoter region. Red “X” indicates all BLAST hits lack an ATF6 binding site.
Fig. 5. ATF6 supports arthropod infection through Stomatin-regulated cholesterol delivery to the pathogen. (A) Infection activates ATF6 which translocates to the nucleus and upregulates stomatin expression. Stomatin regulates cholesterol distribution in the cell and to the Anaplasma containing vacuole for growth and survival in ticks. (B) ArthroQuest was used to identify organisms containing ATF6 binding sites in the promoter regions of Stomatin orthologs. Stomatin orthologs were identified using the Ixodes protein sequence. Green checkmarks indicate that the top ortholog contains an ATF6 binding site in the promoter region. Yellow checkmarks indicate that a significant ortholog hit contains an ATF6 binding site in the promoter region. Red “X” indicates all BLAST hits lack an ATF6 binding site.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6717e1 · DOI
  2. D. E. Sonenshine, Range expansion of tick disease vectors in North America: Implications for spread of tick-borne disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 478 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Microbial Threats, “Vector-borne disease emergence and resurgence” in Vector-Borne Diseases: Understanding the Environmental, Human Health, and Ecological Connections: Workshop Summary (National Academies Press (US), 2008).
  4. C. D. Paddock, R. S. Lane, J. E. Staples, M. B. Labruna, Changing Paradigms for Tick-Borne Diseases in The Americas (National Academies Press (US), 2016).
  5. Critical Needs and Gaps in Understanding Prevention, Amelioration, and Resolution of Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Diseases: The Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes: Workshop Report (National Academies Press, 2011).
  6. 10.1017/S0031182004005967 · DOI
  7. J. M. Park, A. S. Oliva Chávez, D. K. Shaw, Ticks: More than just a pathogen delivery service. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 739419 (2021). · DOI
  8. L. C. Sidak-Loftis , The unfolded-protein response triggers the arthropod immune deficiency pathway. mBio 13, e0070322 (2022). · DOI
  9. K. L. Rosche , PERK-mediated antioxidant response is key for pathogen persistence in ticks. mSphere 8, e0032123 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.tips.2011.10.002 · DOI
  11. R. F. Hillary, U. FitzGerald, A lifetime of stress: ATF6 in development and homeostasis. J. Biomed. Sci. 25, 48 (2018). · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.61675 · DOI
  13. K. L. Rosche, L. C. Sidak-Loftis, J. Hurtado, E. A. Fisk, D. K. Shaw, Arthropods under pressure: Stress responses and immunity at the pathogen-vector interface. Front. Immunol. 11 (2021). · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nrmicro3393 · DOI
  15. A. Arensdorf, D. Diedrichs, T. Rutkowski, Regulation of the transcriptome by ER stress: Non-canonical mechanisms and physiological consequences. Front. Genet. 4, 256 (2013). · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)61473-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M010486200 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/MCB.20.18.6755-6767.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/genetics/iyad031 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkab1028 · DOI
  24. P. D. Thomas , PANTHER: Making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci. 31, 8 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25937 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.05.005 · DOI
  27. D. Y. Dadey , The ATF6 pathway of the ER stress response contributes to enhanced viability in glioblastoma. Oncotarget 7, 2080 (2015). · DOI
  28. B. Zhou , Notch signaling pathway: Architecture, disease, and therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 1–33 (2022).
  29. U. Salzer, M. Mairhofer, R. Prohaska, Stomatin: A New Paradigm of Membrane Organization Emerges (Global Science Books, 2007).
  30. 10.1038/s41467-018-08129-2 · DOI
  31. 10.4269/ajtmh.1990.42.352 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.06.005 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pone.0178646 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000329 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M110.134775 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkj143 · DOI
  37. Q. Zhang , hTFtarget: A comprehensive database for regulations of human transcription factors and their targets. Genom. Proteomics Bioinf. 18, 120–128 (2020). · DOI
  38. A. Cabezas-Cruz, P. Espinosa, P. Alberdi, J. de la Fuente, Tick-pathogen interactions: The metabolic perspective. Trends Parasitol. 35, 316–328 (2019). · DOI
  39. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00114 · DOI
  40. X.-R. Wang, B. Cull, Apoptosis and autophagy: Current understanding in tick-pathogen interactions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12, 784430 (2022). · DOI
  41. J. M. Park , An Anaplasma phagocytophilum T4SS effector, AteA, is essential for tick infection. mBio 14, e0171123 (2023).
  42. 10.1038/ncomms14401 · DOI
  43. E. E. M. Carroll , P47 licenses activation of the immune deficiency pathway in the tick Ixodes scapularis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 205–210 (2019). · DOI
  44. 10.1073/pnas.2208673120 · DOI
  45. A. Rolandelli , Tick hemocytes have a pleiotropic role in microbial infection and arthropod fitness. Nat. Commun. 15, 2117 (2024). · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.pt.2020.07.010 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/bit.23282 · DOI
  48. N. Ayllón , Systems biology of tissue-specific response to anaplasma phagocytophilum reveals differentiated apoptosis in the tick vector Ixodes scapularis. PLoS Genet. 11 (2015). · DOI
  49. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.180240 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.it.2018.09.003 · DOI
  51. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004697 · DOI
  52. M. Goldmann , The Lipid raft-associated protein stomatin is required for accumulation of dectin-1 in the phagosomal membrane and for full activity of macrophages against Aspergillus fumigatus. mSphere 8, e0052322 (2023). · DOI
  53. R. E. Quiroz-Castañeda, H. Aguilar-Díaz, I. Amaro-Estrada, An alternative vaccine target for bovine anaplasmosis based on enolase, a moonlighting protein. Front. Vet. Sci. 10, 1225873 (2023). · DOI
  54. 10.4014/jmb.1409.09063 · DOI
  55. 10.1128/mBio.02299-21 · DOI
  56. Q. Xiong, M. Lin, W. Huang, Y. Rikihisa, Infection by Anaplasma phagocytophilum requires recruitment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by flotillins. mBio 10, e02783–02818 (2019), 10.1128/mbio.02783-18. · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.2405209121 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/1348-0421.12770 · DOI
  59. M. Labandeira-Rey, J. T. Skare, Decreased infectivity in Borrelia burgdorferi strain B31 is associated with loss of linear plasmid 25 or 28-1. Infect Immun. 69, 446–455 (2001). · DOI
  60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/nar/gkab1112 · DOI · Paper page
  62. D. Charif, J. R. Lobry, “SeqinR 1.0-2: A contributed package to the R project for statistical computing devoted to biological sequences retrieval and analysis” in Structural Approaches to Sequence Evolution: Molecules, Networks, Populations, Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, U. Bastolla, M. Porto, H. E. Roman, M. Vendruscolo, Eds. (Springer Verlag, 2007), pp. 207–232. · DOI
  63. D. J. Winter, Rentrez: An R package for the NCBI eUtils API. R J. 9, 520–526 (2017). · DOI
  64. K. A. Vosbigian “ATF6 enables pathogen infection in ticks by inducing stomatin and altering cholesterol dynamics.” GitHub. https://github.com/Shaw-Lab/Vosbigian-et-al-2025. Deposited 10 January 2025. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Vosbigian, K. A., Wright, S. J., Steiert, B. P., Rosche, K. L., Fisk, E. A., Ramirez-Zepp, E., Park, J. M., Shelden, E. A., & Shaw, D. K.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Dana K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-06-17
Volume
122
Issue
25
Pages
e2501045122-e2501045122
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4411360127
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI162819, R21AI139772, R21AI148578, T32GM008336, T32AI007025)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R25EB027606)
  • Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation (ARCS)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Keywords
ATF6, unfolded protein response, Ixodes scapularis, stomatin, cholesterol homeostasis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, tick-borne pathogens, tick vector competence, tick-borne diseases, transcription factor binding site prediction, lipid homeostasis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review