Predictions from deep learning propose substantial protein–carbohydrate interplay
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Noncovalent interaction between proteins and carbohydrates (sugars, glycans) is the basis for biological functions from metabolic regulation to intercellular recognition. It is a grand challenge to identify the protein–carbohydrate interactomes in organisms. Direct experiments would require extensive libraries of glycans to distinguish binding from nonbinding proteins. Computational screening of proteins for carbohydrate binding potential provides an attractive alternative. Current estimates propose that <5% of proteins bind carbohydrates, a number that is not well established. We therefore developed a neural network, “Protein interaction of Carbohydrates Predictor” (PiCAP), to predict whether a protein noncovalently binds to a carbohydrate. We trained PiCAP on a manually curated dataset of known carbohydrate binders and proteins that we identified as likely not to bind carbohydrates (transcription factors, cytoskeletal components, and small-molecule-binding proteins). PiCAP achieves 90% balanced accuracy on protein-level predictions of carbohydrate binding/nonbinding. Using the same datasets, we developed Carbohydrate Protein Site Identifier 2 (CAPSIF2) to predict protein residues that interact noncovalently with carbohydrates. CAPSIF2 achieves a Dice coefficient of 0.57 on residue-level predictions on our independent test dataset, outperforming previous models. To demonstrate the models’ biological applicability, we investigated human cell surface proteins and further predicted the likelihood of carbohydrate binding in six proteomes ( Escherichia coli , Mus musculus, Homo sapiens, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster ). PiCAP predicts that ~35 to 40% of proteins in these proteomes bind carbohydrates, with 75% of extracellular and cell surface proteins predicted to bind. The PiCAP predicted binders are enriched for functions including growth factor receptor binding, inflammation, and cell–cell adhesion.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Deep learning methods have recently overtaken most traditional algorithms for all biomo lecular methods on all biopolymers, including prediction of protein structure, protein - small molecule interactions, and de novo protein design (8–12).”
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Further augmentation of the NoCAP dataset could improve on the breadth of the training data by using sequence databases in conjunction with structure predictions such as AF3 (9) or Boltz (34).”
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Varadi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Alfaris, N., Waldrop, S., Johnson, V., Boaventura, B., Kendrick, K., & Stanford, F. C. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102782 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Canner, S. W., Schnaar, R. L., & Gray, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gray, Jeffrey J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2026-05-18
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- e2523342123-e2523342123
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC11952328
- OpenAlex
- W7161564967
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35-GM141881, R01-GM160587)
- HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01-AI162381)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- carbohydrate-protein interactions, glycans, neural network predictor, protein-protein interaction network, cell surface proteins, extracellular proteins, proteome-wide prediction, growth factor receptors, cell adhesion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review