The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogenomic analysis of type I polyketide synthase genes in pathogenic and saprobic ascomycetes
Open accessAbstract
Fungal type I polyketides (PKs) are synthesized by PK synthases (PKSs) and include well known secondary metabolites such as the anticholesterol drug lovastatin and the potent natural carcinogen aflatoxin. Other type I PKs are known to be virulence factors for some plant pathogens and pigments such as melanin. In this study, a phylogenomic approach was used to investigate the origin and diversity of fungal genes encoding putative PKSs that are predicted to synthesize type I PKs. The resulting genealogy, constructed by using the highly conserved PKS ketosynthase (KS) domain, indicated that: ( i ) Species within subphylum Pezizomycotina (phylum Ascomycota) but not early diverging ascomycetes, like Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Saccharomycotina) or Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Taphrinomycotina), had large numbers (7–25) of PKS genes. ( ii ) Bacteria and fungi had separate groups of PKS genes; the few exceptions are the likely result of horizontal gene transfer from bacteria to various sublineages of fungi. ( iii ) The bulk of genes encoding fungal PKSs fell into eight groups. Four groups were predicted to synthesize variously reduced PKs, and four groups were predicted to make unreduced PKs. ( iv ) Species within different classes of Pezizomycotina shared the same groups of PKS genes. ( v ) Different fungal genomes shared few putative orthologous PKS genes, even between closely related genomes in the same class or genus. ( vi ) The discontinuous distributions of orthologous PKS s among fungal species can be explained by gene duplication, divergence, and gene loss; horizontal gene transfer among fungi does not need to be invoked.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis
Kämper, J., Kahmann, R., Bölker, M., Ma, L.-J., Brefort, T., Saville, B. J., Banuett, F., Kronstad, J. W., Gold, S. E., Müller, O., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05248 · Cited by 1,208
Synthesis and assembly of fungal melanin
Eisenman, H. C., & Casadevall, A. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3777-2 · Cited by 711
Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land
Treseder, K. K., & Lennon, J. T. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00001-15 · Cited by 625
Botrytis cinerea virulence factors: new insights into a necrotrophic and polyphageous pathogen
Choquer, M., Fournier, E., Kunz, C., Levis, C., Pradier, J.-M., Simon, A., & Viaud, M. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00930.x · Cited by 451
Schumacher, J. (2016) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.13262 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Kroken, S., Glass, N. L., Taylor, J. W., Yoder, O. C., & Turgeon, B. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-15
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 15670-15675
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2059977778
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenomic analysis of type I polyketide synthase genes in pathogenic and saprobic ascomycetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2532165100
- The paper
- Kroken, S., Glass, N. L., Taylor, J. W., Yoder, O. C., & Turgeon, B. G. (2003). Phylogenomic analysis of type I polyketide synthase genes in pathogenic and saprobic ascomycetes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2532165100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.