The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogenetic and biochemical evidence for sterol synthesis in the bacterium Gemmata obscuriglobus
Open accessAbstract
Sterol biosynthesis is viewed primarily as a eukaryotic process, and the frequency of its occurrence in bacteria has long been a subject of controversy. Two enzymes, squalene monooxygenase and oxidosqualene cyclase, are the minimum necessary for initial biosynthesis of sterols from squalene. In this work, 19 protein gene sequences for eukaryotic squalene monooxygenase and 12 protein gene sequences for eukaryotic oxidosqualene cyclase were compared with all available complete and partial prokaryotic genomes. The only unequivocal matches for a sterol biosynthetic pathway were in the proteobacterium, Methylococcus capsulatus , in which sterol biosynthesis is known, and in the planctomycete, Gemmata obscuriglobus . The latter species contains the most abbreviated sterol pathway yet identified in any organism. Analysis shows that the major sterols in Gemmata are lanosterol and its uncommon isomer, parkeol. There are no subsequent modifications of these products. In bacteria, the sterol biosynthesis genes occupy a contiguous coding region and possibly comprise a single operon. Phylogenetic trees constructed for both enzymes show that the sterol pathway in bacteria and eukaryotes has a common ancestry. It is likely that this contiguous reading frame was exchanged between bacteria and early eukaryotes via lateral gene transfer or endosymbiotic events. The primitive sterols produced by Gemmata suggest that this genus could retain the most ancient remnants of the sterol biosynthetic pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biochemistry and Evolution of Anaerobic Energy Metabolism in Eukaryotes
Müller, M., Mentel, M., van Hellemond, J. J., Henze, K., Woehle, C., Gould, S. B., Yu, R.-Y., van der Giezen, M., Tielens, A. G. M., & Martin, W. F. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05024-11 · Cited by 838
Wagner, M., & Horn, M. (2006) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.005 · Cited by 465
Paleobiological Perspectives on Early Eukaryotic Evolution
Knoll, A. H. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016121 · Cited by 394
Steroids, triterpenoids and molecular oxygen
Summons, R. E., Bradley, A. S., Jahnke, L. L., & Waldbauer, J. R. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1837 · Cited by 364
On the maverick Planctomycetes
Wiegand, S., Jogler, M., & Jogler, C. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuy029 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, A., Budin, M., & Brocks, J. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-12-05
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 15352-15357
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1972392332
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic and biochemical evidence for sterol synthesis in the bacterium Gemmata obscuriglobus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2536559100
- The paper
- Pearson, A., Budin, M., & Brocks, J. J. (2003). Phylogenetic and biochemical evidence for sterol synthesis in the bacterium Gemmata obscuriglobus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2536559100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.