The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the maverick Planctomycetes
Open accessAbstract
Planctomycetes are ubiquitous, environmentally and biotechnologically important bacteria that are key players in global carbon and nitrogen cycles. Ever since their first discovery in the 1920s they seemed to blur the prokaryote /eukaryote dichotomy. After initially being described as fungi and reclassified as bacteria later, they were still thought to feature a nucleus-like compartment surrounding their highly condensed DNA. Also, an endocytosis-like uptake mechanism for macromolecules was described. Besides these eukaryotic hallmark traits, Planctomycetes seemed to lack typical bacterial features such as a peptidoglycan cell wall or the universal bacterial cell division protein FtsZ, while mostly dividing by polar budding instead of binary fission. Thus, Planctomycetes were speculated to be ancestral to both, bacteria and eukaryotes. With the advent of novel microscopic techniques, along with the development of genetic tools for Planctomycetes, some of these hypotheses were revisited. Surprisingly, Planctomycetes were found to possess a peptidoglycan cell wall and to comprise a cell plan comparable to other Gram-negative bacteria as the nucleus-like structure is rather an invagination of the cytoplasmic membrane than a cohesive compartment. These finding challenge the idea of a eukaryotic ancestry of the phylum, as Planctomycetes now appear similar, yet distinct to other bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Cayrou, C., Sambe, B., Armougom, F., Raoult, D., & Drancourt, M. (2013) · Apmis · doi:10.1111/apm.12087 · Cited by 57
RetractedThe SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., & Glöckner, F. O. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219 · Cited by 33,055
FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Letunic, I., & Bork, P. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw290 · Cited by 5,016
Yarza, P., Yilmaz, P., Pruesse, E., Glöckner, F. O., Ludwig, W., Schleifer, K.-H., Whitman, W. B., Euzéby, J., Amann, R., & Rosselló-Móra, R. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3330 · Cited by 2,589
Strous, M., Heijnen, J. J., Kuenen, J. G., & Jetten, M. S. M. (1998) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530051340 · Cited by 2,319
A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Oliverio, A. M., Brewer, T. E., Benavent-González, A., Eldridge, D. J., Bardgett, R. D., Maestre, F. T., Singh, B. K., & Fierer, N. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9516 · Cited by 2,301
A new view of the tree of life
Hug, L. A., Baker, B. J., Anantharaman, K., Brown, C. T., Probst, A. J., Castelle, C. J., Butterfield, C. N., Hernsdorf, A. W., Amano, Y., Ise, K., et al. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48 · Cited by 2,039
Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future
Steneck, R. S., Graham, M. H., Bourque, B. J., Corbett, D., Erlandson, J. M., Estes, J. A., & Tegner, M. J. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892902000322 · Cited by 1,973
Cited by
Influence of Photobioreactor Set-up on the Survival of Microalgae Inoculum
Bani, A., Fernandez, F. G. A., D'Imporzano, G., Parati, K., & Adani, F. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124408 · Cited by 42
Human Gut Metagenomes Encode Diverse GH156 Sialidases
Mann, E., Shekarriz, S., & Surette, M. G. (2022) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01755-22 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiegand, S., Jogler, M., & Jogler, C.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-07-24
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 739-760
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2883298854
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 168
- FWCI
- 19.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the maverick Planctomycetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/femsre/fuy029
- The paper
- Wiegand, S., Jogler, M., & Jogler, C. (2018). On the maverick Planctomycetes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuy029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
