Cited by 2Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

A reassessment of NMDA receptor-dependent presynaptic homeostatic plasticity

Open access
Chen, Xiumin, Dou, Tianli, Zhang, Junting, Hong, Yidan, Nicoll, Roger A.·2026·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Excitatory glutamatergic synapses in the brain are remarkably plastic. Two forms of plasticity have received the most attention: long-term potentiation (LTP) and synaptic homeostasis. While LTP requires the activation of NMDA receptors, synaptic homeostasis does not. However, both phenomena are mediated by the recruitment of postsynaptic AMPA receptors (AMPAR) to the synapse. Recently a new form of plasticity has been described referred to as presynaptic homeostatic plasticity (PHP). Pharmacological inhibition of AMPAR synaptic responses in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells initiates a rapid homeostatic response that results in the recovery of the AMPAR responses to normal values in the continued presence of the inhibitor. Accompanying this recovery is a doubling of the NMDA receptor response which is interpreted as an increase in the release of glutamate. This is provocative since claiming that a reduction in AMPAR responses triggers an enhancement in NMDA receptor responses. Using three different protocols to monitor synaptic responses we fail to observe any recovery of synaptic responses in the presence of an AMPAR inhibitor. Furthermore, there was no enhancement in NMDA receptor responses. Thus, we find no evidence for the presence of PHP at CA1 hippocampal synapses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2617982123

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors do not show the data at the two temperatures.

    “The authors of this study argue that they saw no difference in their results at the two temperatures but do not show the data at the two temperatures, so the etiology of the failure to replicate remains unclear.”
  • This is a report of a failure to replicate in which numerous details of experimental design were slightly different, including recording temperature (one group having used RT and the other 35C).

    “This is a report of a failure to replicate in which numerous details of experimental design were slightly different, including recording temperature (one group having used RT and the other 35C.”
  • The etiology of the failure to replicate remains unclear.

    “The authors of this study argue that they saw no difference in their results at the two temperatures but do not show the data at the two temperatures, so the etiology of the failure to replicate remains unclear.”
  • The authors of this study argue that they saw no difference in their results at the two temperatures.

    “The authors of this study argue that they saw no difference in their results at the two temperatures but do not show the data at the two temperatures, so the etiology of the failure to replicate remains unclear.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., Dou, T., Zhang, J., Hong, Y., & Nicoll, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Soochow University (CN)
  • Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Xiumin
  • Nicoll, Roger A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-07-14
Volume
123
Issue
29
Pages
e2617982123-e2617982123
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W7168310237
Cited by
2
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (82401708)
  • JST | Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20240788)
  • HHS | NIH | All of Us Research Program (R01MH117139)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
NMDA receptor, AMPA receptors, synaptic homeostasis, long-term potentiation, glutamate release
MeSH terms
Animals, Homeostasis, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Presynaptic Terminals, Receptors, AMPA, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review