Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RADIOIMMUNOASSAY FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF ADENOSINE 3′,5′-CYCLIC PHOSPHATE

Open access
Steiner, A. L., Kipnis, D. M., Utiger, R., Parker, C.·1969·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay for adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic phosphate (cyclic AMP) has been developed which allows measurement of the nucleotide in extracts of 5-10 mg of tissue. The radioimmunoassay is sufficiently specific for cyclic AMP to eliminate the need for prior chromatographic separation of the cyclic nucleotide from other tissue nucleotides. The radioimmunoassay system is based upon competition of cyclic AMP with a labeled cyclic AMP derivative of high specific activity for binding sites on an antibody specific for the cyclic nucleotide. Antibody to cyclic AMP was obtained by immunizing rabbits with an antigen prepared by conjugating succinyl cyclic AMP with human serum albumin. A high specific activity derivative of cyclic AMP was prepared by synthesizing succinyl cyclic AMP tyrosine methyl ester (SCAMP-TME) and iodinating the phenolic hydroxyl group of the tyrosine moiety with 125 I. Free and antibody-bound 125 I-SCAMP-TME were separated by precipitation of the antibody-bound fraction with a second antibody (goat anti-rabbit gamma globulin). Displacement of 125 I-SCAMP-TME by unlabeled cyclic AMP when plotted as a semilogarithmic function was linear over a concentration range of 2-100 picomoles. The specificity of the antibody was tested against structurally related nucleotides, nucleosides, and purine bases. All had less than 0.005 per cent of the potency of cyclic AMP in inhibiting 125 I-SCAMP-TME binding. The marked differences in affinity of the various cyclic nucleotides to cyclic AMP antibody would suggest that antibodies can be developed for each of the cyclic nucleotides by the principles used in this work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.64.1.367

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Steiner, A. L., Kipnis, D. M., Utiger, R., & Parker, C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1969-09
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
367-373
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2048078487
Cited by
599
References
1
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RADIOIMMUNOASSAY FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF ADENOSINE 3′,5′-CYCLIC PHOSPHATE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.64.1.367
The paper
Steiner, A. L., Kipnis, D. M., Utiger, R., & Parker, C. (1969). RADIOIMMUNOASSAY FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF ADENOSINE 3′,5′-CYCLIC PHOSPHATE. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.64.1.367

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.