The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Binding of Dodecyl Sulfate to Proteins at High Binding Ratios. Possible Implications for the State of Proteins in Biological Membranes
Open accessAbstract
A wide variety of proteins have been shown to bind identical amounts of an amphiphile, sodium dodecyl sulfate, on a gram per gram basis at monomer equilibrium concentrations above 0.5 mM. The binding is independent of ionic strength and primarily hydrophobic in nature. Only the monomeric form of the amphiphile binds to proteins, not the micellar form. The application of these results to models for biological membranes and to gel electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structure and function of the epidermal barrier
Wickett, R. R., & Visscher, M. O. (2006) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.295 · Cited by 327
Self-association of cholesterol in aqueous solution
Haberland, M. E., & Reynolds, J. A. (1973) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.70.8.2313 · Cited by 274
Self-citationMoore, B. D., Rangachari, V., Tay, W. M., Milkovic, N. M., & Rosenberry, T. L. (2009) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi901571t · Cited by 43
The benefits (and misfortunes) of SDS in top-down proteomics
Kachuk, C., & Doucette, A. A. (2018) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2017.03.002 · Cited by 39
Liu, X., Dong, Z., & Timp, G. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22305-x · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, J. A., & Tanford, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1970-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1002-1007
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2077085156
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
