The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contemporaneous Disequilibrium, a New Hypothesis to Explain the „Paradox of the Plankton”
Open accessAbstract
The diversity of lake phytoplankton is unexpectedly high, since the epilimnion of a lake is continuously mixing and might be expected to have only one or at most a few niches for primary producers. However, a carefully replicated series of samples from Castle Lake, Calif., showed a high degree of patchiness for many phytoplankton species, indicating that the rate of mixing is slow enough relative to the reproductive rate of the algae for many different niches to exist simultaneously. Productivity per unit biomass ratios, measured at Lake Tahoe, California-Nevada, shows that the turnover times for carbon in even this ultraoligotrophic lake are often less than 1 day. High diversity is associated with high productivity per unit biomass and high zooplankton populations in this lake. A contemporaneous disequilibrium model to explain the diversity of the lake phytoplankton is therefore highly plausible. At any one time, many patches of water exist in which one species is at a competitive advantage relative to the others. These water masses are stable enough to permit a considerable degree of patchiness to occur in phytoplankton, but are obliterated frequently enough to prevent the exclusive occupation of each niche by a single species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hardin, G. (1960) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.131.3409.1292 · Cited by 3,426
Cited by
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46540 · Cited by 1,016
Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates
Huston, M. A., & DeAngelis, D. L. (1994) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285720 · Cited by 447
Grossman, G. D., Moyle, P. B., & Whitaker (1982) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284004 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Richerson, P., Armstrong, R., & Goldman, C. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1970-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1710-1714
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1970833178
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporaneous Disequilibrium, a New Hypothesis to Explain the „Paradox of the Plankton”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.67.4.1710
- The paper
- Richerson, P., Armstrong, R., & Goldman, C. R. (1970). Contemporaneous Disequilibrium, a New Hypothesis to Explain the „Paradox of the Plankton”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.67.4.1710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.