The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates
Abstract
Classical resource competition theory can be generalized to apply to a variety of specific resource types and specific supply media (e.g., soil, water, or air). We develop a general model that relaxes the assumptions that (1) resources and organisms are sufficiently mixed that all organisms experience the same resource concentration and (2) the organisms themselves regulate the resource concentration of their shared environment. These assumptions are shown to apply to a limited subset of conditions in which the resource input rate is low and the resource transport rate in the environment is high. Under such conditions, the coexistence criteria of our general model converge with those of classical resource competition models. Such conditions may be met in some aquatic environments, but under other conditions, in which resource transport rates may be low or input fluxes high, the general model makes predictions that differ radically from those of the classical models. Specifically, our model predicts that, instead of a 1:1 ratio between limiting resources and locally coexisting species, a large number of species can coexist on a single limiting resource under steady-state conditions. Shifts from limitation by one type of resource to limitation by another type can dramatically alter the nature and intensity of competitive interactions. This phenomenon is proposed as the explanation for the ubiquitous unimodel curve of autotroph diversity along productivity gradients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Self-citationCompetitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation
GRIME, J. P. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/242344a0 · Cited by 2,507
Grover, J. P. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285254 · Cited by 271
Cited by
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Huston, M. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050180 · Cited by 1,772
Self-citationWHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I., & Gough, L. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2381:witorb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,650
Huston, M. A. (1999) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546645 · Cited by 747
Self-citationPatterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal
Pausas, J. G., & Austin, M. P. (2001) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3236601 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Huston, M. A., & DeAngelis, D. L.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 954-977
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2070503036
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285720
- The paper
- Huston, M. A., & DeAngelis, D. L. (1994). Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.