Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Matching Sequences under Deletion/Insertion Constraints

Open access
Sankoff, David·1972·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Given two finite sequences, we wish to find the longest common subsequences satisfying certain deletion/insertion constraints. Consider two successive terms in the desired subsequence. The distance between their positions must be the same in the two original sequences for all but a limited number of such pairs of successive terms. Needleman and Wunsch gave an algorithm for finding longest common subsequences without constraints. This is improved from the viewpoint of computational economy. An economical algorithm is then elaborated for finding subsequences satisfying deletion/insertion constraints. This result is useful in the study of genetic homology based on nucleotide or amino-acid sequences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.69.1.4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Sankoff, D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1972-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
4-6
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2044966609
Cited by
296
References
1
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching Sequences under Deletion/Insertion Constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.69.1.4
The paper
Sankoff, D. (1972). Matching Sequences under Deletion/Insertion Constraints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.69.1.4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.