Cited by 11Error Correcting Code TechniquesCoding theory and cryptographyAlgorithms and Data Compression

The Error Probability of Maximum-Likelihood Decoding over Two Deletion/Insertion Channels

Sabary, Omer, Yaakobi, Eitan, Yucovich, Alexander·2020·2020 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of reconstructing a word given several of its noisy copies. This setup is motivated by several applications, among them is reconstructing strands in DNA-based storage systems. Under this paradigm, a word is transmitted over some fixed number of identical independent channels and the goal of the decoder is to output the transmitted word or some close approximation. The main focus of this paper is the case of two deletion channels and studying the error probability of the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder under this setup. First, it is discussed how the ML decoder operates. Then, we observe that the dominant error patterns are deletions in the same run or errors resulting from alternating sequences. Based on these observations, it is derived that the error probability of the ML decoder is roughly (3q - 1)/(q - 1) p2, when the transmitted word is any q-ary sequence and p is the channel's deletion probability. We also study the cases when the transmitted word belongs to the Varshamov Tenengolts (VT) code or the shifted VT code. Lastly, the insertion channel is studied as well. These theoretical results are verified by corresponding simulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isit44484.2020.9174488

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent works have explored efficient clustering methods tailored to DNA data storage and efficient encoding schemes that allow recovery of a sequence from multiple noisy reads.

    “Recent works have explored the development of efficient clustering methods tailored to DNA data storage, as well as efficient encoding schemes that allow the recovery of a sequence from multiple noisy reads.93−96”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabary, O., Yaakobi, E., & Yucovich, A.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
763-768
OpenAlex
W3081211058
Cited by
10
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
maximum likelihood decoding, deletion channel, error probability, error patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review