The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences Between Laboratory Strains of Epstein-Barr Virus Based on Immortalization, Abortive Infection, and Interference
Open accessAbstract
Biologic activities of extracellular Epstein-Barr virus (EB virus) from two laboratory strains, namely, P 3 J-HR-1 (P-H) from Burkitt lymphoma and B95-8 (B95) from infectious mononucleosis, were compared. Virus stocks from both sources contained approximately the same number of virions. Virus from the P-H line induced “early antigen” in six nonproducer EB virus genome carrier cell lines; virus from B95 did not induce “early antigen.” Extracellular virus from B95 regularly caused lymphocytes from human umbilical cords to form continuous lines (immortalization); P-H virus did not cause primary cultures of human lymphocytes to grow continuously. B95 virus stimulated DNA synthesis as determined by rate of incorporation of [ 3 H]thymidine into acid-insoluble material; P-H virus did not stimulate DNA synthesis. Pretreatment of lymphocytes with undiluted P-H virus inhibited immortalization and stimulation of DNA synthesis by B95 virus. The inhibitory properties of the P-H virus were sedimented at 100,000 × g and inactivated by heat and UV irradiation; interference by the P-H virus was neutralized by human serum with antibody to EB virus and not by antibody-negative human serum. The hypothesis most consistent with these results is that the P-H virus is defective in gene(s) needed for initiation of immortalization. We speculate that the absence of this gene allows early antigen to be expressed upon super-infection of nonproducer cell lines. The availability of two laboratory strains of EB virus which differ in biologic behavior provides starting material for analysis of the mechanism of lymphocyte immortalization by EB virus and of virus structural differences which affect immortalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herpesvirus Infections in the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
Quinnan, G. V. (1984) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350010038020 · Cited by 398
Tomkinson, B., Robertson, E., & Kieff, E. (1993) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.67.4.2014-2025.1993 · Cited by 388
Epstein-Barr-Virus-Induced One-Carbon Metabolism Drives B Cell Transformation
Wang, L. W., Shen, H., Nobre, L., Ersing, I., Paulo, J. A., Trudeau, S., Wang, Z., Smith, N. A., Ma, Y., Reinstadler, B., et al. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.003 · Cited by 190
Sutkowski, N., Chen, G., Calderon, G., & Huber, B. T. (2004) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.78.14.7852-7860.2004 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, G., Robinson, J., Heston, L., & Lipman, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1974-10
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4006-4010
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2077210975
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences Between Laboratory Strains of Epstein-Barr Virus Based on Immortalization, Abortive Infection, and Interference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.71.10.4006
- The paper
- Miller, G., Robinson, J., Heston, L., & Lipman, M. (1974). Differences Between Laboratory Strains of Epstein-Barr Virus Based on Immortalization, Abortive Infection, and Interference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.10.4006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.