Cited by 146

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Receptor-dependent hydrolysis of cholesteryl esters contained in plasma low density lipoprotein.

Brown, M S, Dana, S E, Goldstein, J L·1975·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Selective radioactive labeling of the cholesteryl esters contained within human plasma low density lipoprotein has allowed the study of the metabolism of these molecules in monolayers and extracts of cultured human fibroblasts. In monolayers of normal cells, binding of low density lipoprotein to its cell surface receptor was followed by rapid hydrolysis of the [3H]cholesteryl linoleate contained within the lipoprotein and accumulation of the liberated [3H]cholesterol within the cell. The stoichiometry of the degradative process suggested that the protein and cholesteryl ester components of the lipoprotein were hydrolyzed in parallel. Incubation of intact fibroblasts with chloroquine, a known inhibitor of lysosomal degradative processes, inhibited the hydrolysis of the lipoprotein-bound cholesteryl esters. Fibroblasts from subjects with the homozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia, which lack functional low density lipoprotein receptors and thus are unable to take up this lipoprotein when it is present in the culture medium at low concentrations, were therefore unable to hydrolyze the lipoprotein-bound [3H]cholesteryl linoleate. However, cell-free extracts from these mutant cells were capable of hydrolyzing the lipoprotein-bound [3H]cholesteryl linoleate at the same rapid rate as normal cells when incubated at acid pH. These data illustrate the essential role of the low density lipoprotein receptor and of lysosomal acid hydrolases in the metabolic utilization of low density lipoproteins by cultured human fibroblasts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.72.8.2925

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 146

Metadata

Authors
Brown, M. S., Dana, S. E., & Goldstein, J. L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1975-08
Volume
72
Issue
8
Pages
2925-2929
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
146
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review