The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inhibition of tubulin assembly by RNA and other polyanions: evidence for a required protein.
Abstract
Nonneural cell extracts contain a heat-stable, nondialyzable activity that will inhibit the spontaneous assembly in vitro of partially purified brain tubulin. The sensitivity of this inhibitory activity to ribonucleases but not to a variety of other hydrolytic enzymes indicates that the inhibitor is an RNA. This conclusion is supported by the observation that purified RNAs from sea urchins, chinese hamster ovary cells, and brain all inhibit spontaneous microtubule assembly in vitro. The synthetic polynucleotides [poly(A), (C), (G), and (U)] are also inhibitory. This inhibition, however, appears to be nonspecific since the RNA base composition is unimportant and a variety of other nonnucleic acid polyanions also function as inhibitors. The treatment of assembly competent tubulin preparations with an insoluble RNA in the form of poly(A) covalently linked to agarose beads produces a "stripped" tubulin which will not assemble microtubules unless a heat-stable, trypsin-sensitive fraction eluted with increased ionic strength is mixed with the "stripped" tubulin. Similar results can be obtained with other cation exchangers, including phosphocellulose and carboxymethylcellulose. The heat-stable protein sequestered by poly(A)-agarose appears to be identical to the "tau" factor recently described by Kirschner and coworkers. Reconstitution experiments indicate that there is a stoichiometric requirement for these factors. These results suggest that spontaneous assembly of microtubules in nonneural cell extracts is blocked because the endogenous factors are complexed with RNA. This idea is supported by the observation that the ratio of tubulin to RNA is low in cultured cell extracts but very high in neural tissue extracts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These data could explain early observations, in which a competition between tubulin and RNA for Tau was suggested based on the ability to isolate cellular Tau together with MTs only in the absence of RNA (Bryan et al, 1975).”
From Molecular crowding and RNA synergize to promote phase separation, microtubule interaction, and seeding of Tau condensates (2022) · cites this paper as Bryan et al, 1975
Citations
Cited by
Kampers, T., Friedhoff, P., Biernat, J., Mandelkow, E.-M., & Mandelkow, E. (1996) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01386-5 · Cited by 548
Nuclear Tau and Its Potential Role in Alzheimer’s Disease
Bukar Maina, M., Al-Hilaly, Y., & Serpell, L. (2016) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom6010009 · Cited by 161
Hochmair, J., Exner, C., Franck, M., Dominguez‐Baquero, A., Diez, L., Brognaro, H., Kraushar, M. L., Mielke, T., Radbruch, H., Kaniyappan, S., et al. (2022) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2021108882 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryan, J. B., Nagle, B. W., & Doenges, K. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1975-09
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3570-3574
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.