The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Totipotency and normal differentiation of single teratocarcinoma cells cloned by injection into blastocysts.
Open accessAbstract
A definitive test for developmental totipotency of mouse malignant teratocarcinoma cells was conducted by cloning singly injected cells in genetically marked blastocysts. Totipotency was conclusively shown in an adult mosaic female whose tumor-strain cells had made substantial contributions to all of the wide range of its somatic tissues analyzed; the clonally propagated cell lineage had therefore differentiated in numerous normal directions. The test cells were from "cores" of embryoid bodies of a euploid, chromosomally male (X/Y), ascites tumor grown only in vivo by transplantation for 8 years. The capacity of cells from the same source to differentiate, in a phenotypic male, into reproductively functional sperms, has been shown in our previous experiments [(1975) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 3585-3589]. Cells from this transplant line therefore provide material suitable for projected somatic and germ-line genetic analyses of mammalian differentiation based on "cycling" of mutation-carrying tumor cells through developing embryos. In some animals obtained from single-cell injections tumor-derived cells were sporadically distributed in developmentally unrelated tissues. These cases can be accounted for by delayed and haphazard cellular integration, and by a marked degree of sustained cellular developmental flexibility in early mammalian development, irrespective of certain classical "germ-layer" designations. All mosaic mice obtained have thus far been free of teratomas. In one case, the injected stem cell contributed only to the pancreas and gave rise to a malignancy resembling pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The high modal frequency of euploidy in these individually tested cells thus tends to indicate that a near-normal chromosome complement is sufficient for total restoration of orderly gene expression in a normal embryonic environment; it may also be necessary for teratoma stem-cell proliferation to be terminated there.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bissell, M. J., & Radisky, D. (2001) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/35094059 · Cited by 2,180
Friends or foes — bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer
Mueller, M. M., & Fusenig, N. E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1477 · Cited by 1,765
Heterogeneity in Cancer: Cancer Stem Cells versus Clonal Evolution
Shackleton, M., Quintana, E., Fearon, E. R., & Morrison, S. J. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.017 · Cited by 1,162
DNA repair, genome stability and cancer: a historical perspective
Jeggo, P. A., Pearl, L. H., & Carr, A. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2015.4 · Cited by 774
From teratocarcinomas to embryonic stem cells and beyond: a history of embryonic stem cell research
Solter, D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1827 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Illmensee, K., & Mintz, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1976-02
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 549-553
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2040895383
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Totipotency and normal differentiation of single teratocarcinoma cells cloned by injection into blastocysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.73.2.549
- The paper
- Illmensee, K., & Mintz, B. (1976). Totipotency and normal differentiation of single teratocarcinoma cells cloned by injection into blastocysts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.73.2.549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.