The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inheritance of selected pathotoxin resistance in maize plants regenerated from cell cultures
Open accessAbstract
Texas male-sterile cytoplasm ( cms -T) maize is susceptible to Helminthosporium maydis race T and its pathotoxin, whereas nonsterile cytoplasm maize is resistant. Callus cultures initiated from immature embryos of a cms -T genotype, BC 1 A188(T), were susceptible to the toxin and were capable of plant regeneration. Toxin-resistant cell lines were selected by a sublethal enrichment procedure in which cms -T callus was grown for several selection cycles (subculture transfers) in the presence of progressively higher concentrations of toxin. Periodically during the selection process, plants were regenerated from the cms -T cultures to determine their susceptibility or resistance to the toxin. Plants regenerated after four cycles of selection were male-sterile and toxin-susceptible as shown by leaf bioassays. All plants regenerated from cell lines isolated from the fifth selection cycle onward, however, were toxin-resistant and 52 of 65 were fully male-fertile. The remaining 13 “male-sterile” resistant plants did not shed pollen and did not resemble cms -T plants in tassel morphology. Some “male-sterile” plants produced anthers containing a small amount of starch-filled pollen, suggesting that the sterility of these 13 plants was not the result of the cms -T trait. Leaf bioassays on F 1 progeny from regenerated resistant plants indicated that resistance to the toxin was inherited only through the female. The male-fertility trait also was inherited only through the female. After inoculation with H. maydis race T spores, leaf lesion size for progeny from regenerated resistant plants coincided with their reaction to the toxin. This result indicated that plant resistance to the pathogen was closely correlated with the toxin resistance obtained through cell culture selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Streptomycin-resistant Plants from Callus Culture of Haploid Tobacco
MALIGA, P., SZ.-BREZNOVITS, Á., & MÁRTON, L. (1973) · Nature New Biology · doi:10.1038/newbio244029a0 · Cited by 471
Cited by
Potato Protoplasts in Crop Improvement
Shepard, J. F., Bidney, D., & Shahin, E. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.208.4439.17 · Cited by 398
A review of somaclonal variation in plantain (Musa spp): mechanisms and applications
Nwauzoma, A., & Jaja, E. (2013) · Journal of Applied Biosciences · doi:10.4314/jab.v67i0.95046 · Cited by 45
“Gengenbach et al (1977) selected for resistance to toxin and regenerated resistant plants with the aim to recover resistant cms breeding lines, but resistant was associated with a concomitant reversion to male sterility.”
BackgroundInfluentialSomaclonal Variation for the Improvement of Tree Species
Joshi, A., Tripathi, A., Sharma, N., & Tailor, A. (2024) · Biotechnological Approaches for Sustaining Forest Trees and Their Products · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_4 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Gengenbach, B. G., Green, C. E., & Donovan, C. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1977-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5113-5117
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2027549592
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inheritance of selected pathotoxin resistance in maize plants regenerated from cell cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.74.11.5113
- The paper
- Gengenbach, B. G., Green, C. E., & Donovan, C. M. (1977). Inheritance of selected pathotoxin resistance in maize plants regenerated from cell cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.11.5113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.