Cited by 5Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesGenetics and Plant Breeding

Somaclonal Variation for the Improvement of Tree Species

Joshi, Anjali, Tripathi, Aparna, Sharma, Nilesh, Tailor, Aditi·2024·Biotechnological Approaches for Sustaining Forest Trees and Their Products

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_4

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joshi, A., Tripathi, A., Sharma, N., & Tailor, A.
Affiliations
Arid Forest Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Joshi, Anjali
Venue
Biotechnological Approaches for Sustaining Forest Trees and Their Products
Published
2024
Pages
77-102
OpenAlex
W4402894761
Cited by
5
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
4.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
somaclonal variation, forest tree breeding, woody perennials, in vitro cell culture, genetic variation, mutation mechanism, aneuploidy, polyploidy, epigenetic modifications, DNA methylation, germplasm conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review